Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2009 North American storm complex/1

February 2009 North American storm complex

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/February_2009_North_American_storm_complex/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: If the only question is over a subsection heading, I think this can be kept. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

This mostly has to do with updating refs and removing dead ones, but there are also WAY too many sections with too many paragraph breaks. There are also points where it is overly detailed. Chess Eric  21:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You'll have to bear with me on this as it may take some time to get things up to par. I wrote this almost 14 years ago when I was in a phase of including minute details so it hasn't aged well. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * LOL! It's alright. We all aren't that good in the beginning and I for one, as you've seen with my recent tornado summaries, have trouble with being too detail-oriented. Chess  Eric  12:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Make sure that if you're going to combine tables, please make sure it doesn't mess up the entries on the list page. Chess  Eric  20:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

where do you feel this article stands now in relation to the GA criteria? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I think that its gotten WAY better. The only question I have is why the impacts from Texas to Louisiana being called West South Central states. Chess  Eric  16:09, 15 May 2023 (UTC)