Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gardein/1

Gardein

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Gardein/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delist While there is no such thing as a speedy delist, either practically or in theory, the concerns over neutrality have not been addressed Aircorn (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

I came upon this article and noticed numerous issues; I was surprised to see a GA tag. Most significantly, it was (and may still be) overtly promotional. I have removed some of the most glaring errors (such as listing the Rabbinical association which found that most of the products are parve), but right now (and at the time it was assessed) it's little more than a list of awards (notable and otherwise) this company has been recognized with. While I'm not saying these awards should all be removed, this bare list of award is not a good example of what a Wikipedia article should be. The 2017 assessment seems very lax to me, and while acknowledging issues, it refuses to ask that the issues be addressed. In any case, I think this is and was a pretty average article. I do not think that it meets the GA requirements and request another look. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk  13:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ouch. Yes, this is a pretty weak article to have the badge -- I'd be inclined to quickfail it were I the reviewer, or at least go for a very "we're going to do significant work here" review. Delist barring substantial improvement; I'd put this around the low end of C-class as it stands. Vaticidalprophet 15:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delist - the rather perfunctory review in 2017 probably didn't improve the article much. At 523 words, this article is far to short for a company like that.  The statistics provided are largely out of date, the controversies and criticism is just one isolated legal incident, restaurant menu inclusion is just isolated things, publicity is also isolated things.  This is simply a long long way from being GA-quality.  I'd be tempted to rate it as start-class instead of C. Hog Farm Talk 05:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist – per Hog Farm. – zmbro (talk) 16:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)