Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Getty Research Institute/1

Getty Research Institute

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Getty_Research_Institute/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Violates GA criteria 2b and 4 - significant information is uncited and the article is overall somewhat promotional in tone. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

WP:MISSION in lede, short lede that is not a full summary, very long (imo unwarranted) list of publications, staff section based on primary source. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't have any comments about the other issues, but what is wrong with using a primary source as a reference for staff? Seems like a WP:ABOUTSELF situation to me. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I would argue that it is WP:UNDUE. PhotographyEdits (talk) 18:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)