Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Google/2

Google

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Google/2&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: ''

Delisted''' per subpar layout and referencing Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

There are too many maintenance tags (such as ) for this to be a good article. It meets one of the Immediate failures criteria.--Proud User (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delist You're right, I also have a few other issues.
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Please don't have citations in the lead
 * Some points have too many cites.
 * Some refs can be expanded
 * To many dls.
 * Too many one sentence paragraphs
 * Inconsistence: "NY Times" and "New York Times"
 * A few fair use rationales could be expanded.
 * "no evil philosophy", "anticorporate", this is un-neutral
 * "no evil" – "no-evil"
 * Put citations after punctuation.
 * To many dls.
 * Too many one sentence paragraphs
 * Inconsistence: "NY Times" and "New York Times"
 * A few fair use rationales could be expanded.
 * "no evil philosophy", "anticorporate", this is un-neutral
 * "no evil" – "no-evil"
 * Put citations after punctuation.


 * You get the idea, this needs lots of work to keep it's status. Thanks, Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 19:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)