Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hamdan v. Rumsfeld/1

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: Delisted. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Not only does this 2006 promotion contain significant uncited material, but, as noted at Sweeps 2023, it contains none of the extensive scholarship on the decision, so fails GA criterion 3a). AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delist It would take a ton of work to bring this up to GA quality, and at that point, we'd almost certainly need a new GAN review. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)