Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/History of Minneapolis/1

History of Minneapolis

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/History_of_Minneapolis/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: Delisted per consensus. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

GA from 2007. There's lots of citation needed tags or unsourced paragraphs. There's page needed tags and a WP:FORUM tag. The great mill disaster and freeways sections are unsourced. Bambots reports "Page number citations needed (December 2017), Style editing needed (October 2018), Unsourced passages need footnotes (January 2021), ... (July 2022)" Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Given that I lost FA status for and good article status for, I'm not holding out any hope for fixing this article either.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * and have been at work at Talk:Minneapolis, and have greatly revamped the main article.  If Susan has interest, it should be possible to carryover some of the improved content at the main article to this one. Hog Farm Talk 23:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry my hands are full at Minneapolis and this summons is a serious, inoportune distraction. We tried hard to save History of Minnesota and all agreed that we failed. Like Elkman, I don't have any hope this article will make it. We should surrender the star now before any more time and effort is wasted. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, as SusanLesch says, for quite a few reasons I shall not go in to here, everyone's hands are quite full at Minneapolis and the hope that someone can restore this article is dim. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  13:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)