Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/IOS 10/1

IOS 10

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/IOS_10/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted not based on prose, which was pretty bad but not disqualifying, but on significant unsourced material in version history section, including statistics (GA criterion 2b). AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

GA from 2017. While the only issue with citations is a refimprove tag at the version history section, i have to call out the prose here. Maybe this is unwarranted but over half the article's prose is just one sentence paragraph after one sentence paragraph after one sentence paragraph. I'm nominating this to see if the prose is enough to warrant a delisting or a rewrite. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)