Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement/1

International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement

 * • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
 * Result: Delist per comments below that a lot of work is needed to bring this article up to GA standards. Geometry guy 14:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Without inline references this does not fullfil the GA criteria.-- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Edit & Weak Keep It is a very nice article cleanly written, multiple media points as well as a broad approach to the topic. But it needs more references, there is not nearly enough references for that much information. It needs many more references before it will become a substantial GA or even FA. Renaissancee (talk) 04:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Delist Although adding citations sounds simple, considering there are general references given, we are looking at adding possibly hundreds of citations, which is a huge amount of work. I do not think this can reasonably done in a short time frame (unless the original writers are going to make a dedicated attempt), so it should be delisted and resubmitted after the work is done.YobMod 12:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Delist Unfortunately I must agree here with the GAR nominator and with, there is simply too much work that would need to be done to address current issues to think that it could take place in a reasonable amount of time, particularly with regard to lack of cites throughout. Cirt (talk) 07:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)