Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jane Zhang/1

Jane Zhang

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Jane_Zhang/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: delisted AustralianRupert (talk) 09:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

This article is no longer updated for "Biography" section, but I added some info about personal life. I think this article should be delisted from Good article. So, I would like to open reassessment for this article.-- Shwangtianyuan  Talk Here  06:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by Shearonink: If I were reviewing this article for GA status now, it would be a Quick-Fail on the referencing issues alone. Shearonink (talk) 23:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delist: this was made a GA in 2007. Although Jane has released two studio albums, one live album, and one E.P. since 2010, the article doesn't discuss any of them. She is also apparently still a major act since she won an MTV award for it as recently as 2015. This article would need a major update and reorganization in order to qualify under the current GA criteria, and absent someone able and willing to do so, I can't see this staying as a GA. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * As a famous singer in China, even in the world, Jane also will released her first English album. She also participated in television programs, ex Hidden Singer in 2016, and I Am a Singer (season 3) in 2015. Why did not add these info? By these reasons, I think it should be delisted.-- Shwangtianyuan  Talk Here  06:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * From what I can see, the issues listed above remain extant. I also think there are issues with information appearing in the lead and no where else (Dolphin Princess/whistle register), which is uncited. As such, if there are no objections, I intend to close this with the result of "delist" five days from now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * the image being used as the main image in this article looks like a typical press-service photo or PR photo and yet the editor who uploaded it to Commons (and who has only ever done this one edit on Commons) said it was their own work...I somehow doubt it.
 * The refs are really not in good shape. When I ran the External links tool I found 12 Not Founds, 4 dead links, a download error, an exceeded redirect limit, changes in sub-domains, etc.
 * There is a possible copyvio with a YouTube description.
 * I have closed this review as "delisted" as the issues raised above have not been addressed. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)