Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Janina San Miguel/1

Janina San Miguel

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Janina_San_Miguel/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Article needs an update, with very little post-2009 information. Uncited text throughout, and unnecessary quoting from the Q&A portion of a pageant. Lede might also need an expansion. Z1720 (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Updated the article. Can you please be more specific which texts are unsourced? I can try finding sources. D-Flo27 (talk) 12:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @D-Flo27, I'm not Z1720 but I have added some "Citation needed" templates to places that need citations. Hopefully it will help. Cheers! Spinixster   (chat!)  14:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adding citations. I would like to add that there are a few other problems:
 * Reference 11 is just a YouTube search page. I'd recommend removing the information that is being cited unless there's another reliable source to back the claim up (if you need help, WP:RSP is your friend.
 * Per WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources, Pageantopolis is not reliable.
 * What makes GetzMo (reference 4) reliable? The page seems to be dead.
 * Below are not really recommendations in order to maintain its GA status, but is still worth fixing.
 * The citation style is inconsistent (some websites are wikilinked, some are not, some include authors, some do not), and per WP:CITEVAR, I'd suggest making it consistent.
 * I would recommend expanding the lead so it would summarize the entire article. Right now, it's quite short and does not summarize the article well. WP:LEAD might help.
 * Reference 23 is dead; I'd recommend finding an archived or live version.
 * Spinixster  (chat!)  06:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, I've made some edits based on your suggestions. However, I'm not sure how I can expand the lead without mentioning her mistakes during the Q&A portion, which has been done on previous versions of this article and was even called out in this article from a popular lifestyle magazine. So, if you have any suggestions on that, let me know. D-Flo27 (talk) 02:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, do you mean what Z1720 has said? I think they meant the quoting in the Question and answer section was what's unnecessary. I would recommend removing the quote and stating that she had answered the question poorly instead. I don't think a quote is needed to show her mistakes. The Q&A portion can still be mentioned in the lead, since it's a prominent part of the section. Spinixster   (chat!)  07:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Did you see the above ? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, unfortunately I've been busy the past week and this week that I haven't been able to add the edits. If someone else can do add those edits for me, that would be nice. D-Flo27 (talk) 04:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)