Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jay Pritzker Pavilion/1

Jay Pritzker Pavilion

 * • Watch article reassessment page
 * Result: After the primary problem areas were addressed, namely the restructuring of the Acoustics section and the expansion of the Events section, the consensus reached was that the article should keep its GA status. Torsodog (talk) 05:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm listing this here for reassessment because I have my doubts that it meets GA criteria for a few reasons. Most notably the Events section, which is lacking a lot more relevant information than it currently has, and the awkward bulleted sections in the Acoustics section that I believe would serve readers better if it were prose. Opinions? Torsodog (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Comment I think this sentence needs rewriting: "Despite the redesign, the pavilion has its blemishes..." because "bit controversial" and "bothers some observers" seems too informal to me. I don't understand this sentence: "been honored for his contribution to the America more accessible" - what is "the America more accessible"? Somno (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I am the main author. I think the problem with the events section is that I wrote it in a way that will obsolesce.
 * I await the bulletpoint v. prose feedback. I will address the events first thing tomorrow.  I am about to go to bed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I think this article is a keeper, although there are issues which need to be addressed. The Acoustics section should be re-structured so that it's less list-like. The Events section would be better if it had more substance. I'd also like to see the article cite better sources. Majoreditor (talk) 01:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I put the bulletpoints in prose.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I also think this is a keeper, unless the significant issues with the Events section I'm missing are raised (and if they are, I'm sure Tony will deal with them!). The acoustics section, now in prose, is good. All seems keepable to me. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * corrected.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:22, 31 May 2008 (UTC)