Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/John F. Kennedy assassination/1

John F. Kennedy assassination

 * • Watch article reassessment page
 * Result: Delist. Sweeps observations endorsed, and no improvements forthcoming. Geometry guy 22:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I have reviewed this article for the GA sweeps, and after leaving the article on hold for the issues raised, only a few were addressed. There are still issues concerning sourcing, and instead of just delisting it, I have brought it here for consensus. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I agree with your sourcing concerns. Any chance that an editor can quickly address these issues so we don't have to de-list? Majoreditor (talk) 17:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist. Sadly, there is no sign of this happening. In addition, the lead is weak as a summary of the article and the notes and references are poorly and inconsistently formatted. There are also images all over the place in one section. Geometry guy 18:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist per above. Majoreditor (talk) 13:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist Sourcing concerns all over the place (one that jumped at me was the statement that Oswald claimed he was a patsy, which has no source) . Inline links to external websites. Odd layout (why are the pictures in the middle of the page?) At least one quotation that's not got a direct citation. I think there is a link farm growing at the end of the article also. I did not look at the prose itself, so not sure how well that measures up. Many of paragraphs seem short. I'm not sure what good the listing of all the vehicles in the motorcade is for. Lead is way too short. Needs some serious work, I'd think. Ealdgyth | Talk 02:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)