Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jutsu (Naruto)/1

Jutsu (Naruto)

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Jutsu_(Naruto)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delist ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

This article doesn't seem to fulfill the Good Article criteria as they currently exist. Its main problem is that most of the references are primary sources and it doesn't have a "broad coverage" per the criteria. The Reception section uses many unreliable sources. Ultimately it appears to be a great deal of plot cruft without much evidence of real world notability that can be accurately verified from the article.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delist: The article seriously lacks of sources: there're something like 14 or 15 sections without any source, other sections with just one source (incidentally, the manga chapters), and so on for the whole length. Reception section is basically a confusing mix of critical comments about battles and Ninja techniques, and that's completely different (just like the article seems to say) from the Jutsu itself. [E.g.: take the last paragraph, with vague Kimlinger comments.] Some sections (see Rinnegan) are surprisengly long and full of in-universe and irrilevant details.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 09:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delist: I don't find it too notable considering we could merge its contents with other characters.Tintor2 (talk) 00:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delist: Multiple unsourced paragraphs or statements, and a lack of outside sources. Merging with what sources are good seems the best option for this article's future. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)