Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ken Anderson (wrestler)/1

Ken Anderson (wrestler)

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Ken_Anderson_(wrestler)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept Agreement that it should be kept AIRcorn (talk) 01:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC).

The article has several problems. One, has huge parts unsourced, like both Independent Circuit section or the TNA final feuds. Some titles are unsourced to. Needs an uptade about his NWA work. Also, the prose can be improved, it's like "on Day 1, he had a match. On day 2, he had a match." Lead can be improved. No mention of his work as box announcer. Missing style and persona(not obligatory, buy helpful) Also, minor In-Universe problems ("he put Shaw into a van heading for a psychiatric facility for intervention.") --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I copyedited the WWE section, the rest still needs to be done.  JTP (talk • contribs) 03:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I got everything now, let me know what you think.  JTP (talk • contribs) 19:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The article has improved a lot. The main issue, unsourced sections, are sources. Just one tiny thing, Online World of Wrestling isn't reliable. Maybe, prose sections can be improved, TNA section has a lot of weekly details and some "in-universe", like the sam shaw storyline. But I think just the change of OWOW source would be enough. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, I think the missing Professional wrestling style and persona would be very helpful. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, after some days working on the article, I think meets GA criteria again. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - All, I've had a quick read of the post-2008 content (which was added after the GA review), and made a couple of copyedits. Sourcing is sufficient, although a source is needed about his video game character. The prose is adequate, but could do with more tweaking to be encyclopaedic. As it stands, however, I think this can stay as a GA. L150 19:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)