Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lego Batman 2: DC Super Heroes/1

Lego Batman 2: DC Super Heroes

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Lego_Batman_2:_DC_Super_Heroes/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lego_Batman_2:_DC_Super_Heroes/GA2 GAN review]

Concerns have been noticed since last month by another user, but haven't been dealt with. The article was reviewed poorly, and it is unlikely to pass its GA criteria when multiple unreliable sources were still used, like Imdb, blogs, etc. The development section was also too short, and all of it were primary sources that was used. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 12:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I think as I said before, I don't really buy that this article requires a GAR. The only issues as far as I can see, is that there are a few unreliable sources being used. I think that the best next step is to note all of the unreliable sources, and see if they can be replaced. Dualshockers was previously mentioned, but I have mentioned this one at WT:VG/RS.Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay. IMDB (cited multiple times), GAME RANT (cited multiple times) ? Mercury News blog (cited multiple times) , Nintendo insider(cited multiple times)? WeKnowGamers? (cited twice?) Primary source cited like Warner bros and Steam? Not sure about GameXplain reliability either. Besode those unreliable sources, the development section is very poor. It needs significant expansion with reliable source, not only sourced with 4 primary sources. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: Delisting per lack of any improvements or participation. Author ignored to participate and improve either. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 11:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)