Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lola Versus Powerman and the Moneygoround, Part One/1

Lola Versus Powerman and the Moneygoround, Part One

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Lola_Versus_Powerman_and_the_Moneygoround,_Part_One/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

A 2009 GA that no longer meets the criteria in its current state. Filled with sourcing issues (such as IMDb), poor prose, a section that has had an expansion tag for two years, unreferenced sections (personnel), among others. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 16:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks . I sourced the personnel section, but I cannot see myself working on this article. Anything after Village Green carries no interest for me. Speaking of which, Arthur probably does not deserve to be a FA at this point (it was promoted back in 2010).  Tkbrett  (✉) 17:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah I completely agree. If you wanna post some FA concerns on the talk page to get the process started I'd say go for it. Otherwise I can do it when I get back from vacation next week. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 17:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)