Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Madurai/1

Madurai

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Madurai/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: Point 1 is fixed; point 2 is understandable as there has been no census since 2011; point 3 is honestly fine. Has survived rather well. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

A GA from 2012. Three reasons I'm nominating this. 1. Uncited material is strewn about the article and will need to be addressed. 2. I believe that the article needs to be updated as most of the article seems to end at 2012 max. 3. This might be a stretch but i'm not all too confident about the article's broadness. for a city with over 1 million people, the article kind of seems small. Especially since the history is only twice the size of the etymology section, a section about the city's name. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment as is fairly usual with Indian GAs, the sections that have most degraded appear to be Culture and Tourism, and Religious Sites (and to a lesser extent Education, Transport). Most of the article (the Etymology, History, Geography, Demographics, Administration, Economy and Media sections) has survived really well, albeit with the caveat that they are now outdated. I don't believe OGJ's third point above is valid, I think all important aspects are covered. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I have rewritten the Religious Sites, Culture, and Transport sections for better prose. See what you think. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)