Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mother Tucker/1

Mother Tucker

 * • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review
 * Result: Kept Ω  pho  is  02:25, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

I feel that this article is in serious need of an overall copyedit. Its reception section also consists of just two brief reviews (one of which is from a review of the entire season) and the ratings. This flaw was noted in the talk page by another editor more than a year ago, but was neither responded to nor dealt with since. I also feel that this article may not be notable (Notability) enough, since its entire notability is pretty much based on one review. Everything else is primary sources. A quick look at the talk page shows that the initial review was very superficial, so I would like a community assessment of it. Ω pho  is  09:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You know, it's not that difficult to expand an article. You could have contacted me on my talk page about your concerns, as there is no need for a good article reasssessment. I've expanded the article, copyedited it, and added another review to the reception section. Thanks for the help. Gage (talk) 15:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The production section currently gives information about a "Weenie and the Butt" scene. This is mentioned nowhere else in the article, so anyone not familiar with the episode would have no idea what it is referring. I would suggest an extra sentence explaining what occurs in the scene and why the sound effects mentioned are relevant. Ω  pho  is  01:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. Still don't see why a GAR was necessary to address such issues as minor as that one was. Gage (talk) 02:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Seeing as myself and others have alerted your project to these issues in the past to no avail, it was necessary. Ω  pho  is  02:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * So it constituted no alert whatsoever, and was only brought up because the season was nominated at WP:GT? Gage (talk) 02:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)