Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Muhammad/2

Muhammad

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Muhammad/2&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: While instability is not in itself a reason to delist, poor quality sourcing is; the discussions on the talk page constitute, in my view, consensus that the sourcing has been degraded. Delisted. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

It has recently been brought to light that this page and its sourcing have been altered fairly wholesale since the page was last reviewed and kept as GA, and that there is little reason to believe the level of former quality has been maintained; on the contrary, recent informal assessments by editors have uncovered significant issues in terms of prior content and source removal, as well as in terms of the quality of new sourcing and the resulting balance of the page and its contents. The sum conclusion of the current state of affairs has already been assessed by several editors as no longer meeting GA standard. For details, see the existing talk page discussion at Talk:Muhammad, as well as the broader discussion entitled Talk:Muhammad, and other subsequent talk page discussions. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Fails Good article criteria It is not stable due to edit warring on the page....: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Moxy -Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg 04:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Even excluding the wholesale rewriting the article has undergone recently, 2012 is a long time ago, and the article quality standards back then were arguably lower. I do not see a reason to maintain GA status given the current edit warring. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)