Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Multiple sequence alignment/1

Multiple sequence alignment

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Multiple_sequence_alignment/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 16:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

In addition to substantial uncited text, the lead of the article is a bit too difficult and the body contains large numbers of external links. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * A request to make the lead image smaller from GA1 doesn't seem to have happened. It is still too big for MOS:IMGSIZE. As well as the unsourced sections and inappropriate extlinks there is a lot of material that appears to be primary-sourced and promotionally worded about individual research projects or implementations, rather than being based on published works by disinterested parties surveying and reviewing the methods that are available, I think maybe problematic with respect to WP:GACR (going into excessive detail). —David Eppstein (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'd like to make time to go over this article this weekend, and I'd appreciate the reassessment remaining open for just a few extra days. Thanks &#8213; Synpath 04:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I've gone through and removed external links in the body of the article and adjusted the lead, but that only amounts to cosmetic changes to the article. I can see now that handling the citations and removing the conversational tone of the article is more editing than I'm willing to spend time on. Thanks for keeping the discussion open. &#8213; Synpath 06:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)