Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/No Age/1

No Age
Passed GA seven years ago and material since then is here-and-there, without many citations. Lead section is what I would expect from a start-class article. Matters of broadness are also lacking, I get no idea of their style of music, their musical and vocal influences &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 01:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/No_Age/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Consensus stands for delisting. Retrohead (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC).

Demote Last section is a mess. Too many small paragraphs. Practically no citations. Certainly not GA worthy and too much to do to simply give someone time to care of it swiftly. Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Demote Just used Checklinks and I have found that references 2 and 7 are broken and 12 redirects to the homepage. If that wasn't bad enough, some paragraphs aren't even sourced at all. I am also wondering if the image is sufficient enough for this article as well. Nonetheless, we can contact Bobamnertiopsis and see if he can fix this article. Good888 (talk) 09:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)