Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Outnumbered/1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''


 * 1) The whole article needs to be copy-edited, especially the lead and Reception sections.
 * 2) There shouldn't be any references in the lead section. The lead section also doesn't summarize the body of the article well enough.
 * 3) Bare URLs are present in the reference section.
 * 4) There is an original research tag present.
 * 5) The main ratings section should be incorporated in this article.
 * 6) The Ratings section in the Reception section should summarise all the series, not just the first one.
 * 7) The critical reception section should summarise what the reviewers said, keeping quotations to a minimum.
 * 8) The Awards section needs padding out. It consists of paragraphs which are just one sentence long!
 * 9) The DVD releases section needs references.

I'll conduct a more thorough review once the concerns above have been addressed.   Tentinator    10:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Just noting I took the two minutes necessary to fix the bare URLs and find a ref for the original research tag.  SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  12:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The more significant issues haven't been addressed so I'm going to delist this.   Tentinator    18:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)