Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Papal conclave/1

Papal conclave

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Papal_conclave/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Significant violations of criterion 2b and minor violations of criterion 3b. Delisted. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Many unreferenced paragraphs and also many half-referenced paragraphs, especially in the second half of the article. There is also one citation needed tags. Those are violations of criterion 2b.

A few paragraphs are very long and should be split in two. Some of the descriptions of the voting process go very much into detail about the possible and hypothetical steps that can or should be taken in different scenarios. This could be a violation of criterion 3b.

The article received a GAR 14 years ago. It also received a peer review 6 years ago where concerns about the sourcing were discussed. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)