Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pinky and the Brain/1

Pinky and the Brain

 * • Watch article reassessment page
 * Result: Delist. Geometry guy 21:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay, here goes: Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Lead does not summarize article. Do we really need a quote in the article, especially one that is only allegedly the tagline? The lead also seems to suggest that the article is about the characters and not the show.
 * Most of Pinky's description is unsourced.
 * Large portions of "Production" are unsourced.
 * No section on critical reception.
 * I don't believe you've transcluded this to the GAR page. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 22:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought it transcluded automatically. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It takes an hour (when the bot is working). See also WP:PURGE. Geometry guy 22:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delist. Poorly cited and difficult to understand for someone who has not watched an episode. Ten Pound Hammer's concerns are spot-on. Geometry guy 00:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist per TenPoundHammer, plus: The lead needs to be expanded to sufficiently cover the article. 32 out of 53 of the current references are to individual episodes, ref 50 (Gookie) is to a Google group, there are a couple of references to IMDB. There does seem to be some sort of a reception section by the name of "Reponse", but parts of it read more like a list of trivia. Anyway, overall, not GA quality. Dana boomer (talk) 02:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)