Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Puri/1

Puri

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Puri/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Consensus to keep from three editors. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

A GA from 2016. Minor amounts of uncited material though I am mainly worried about the entire transportation section being unsourced. Considering that section is important to have from a broadness standpoint, it should be addressed along with other uncited statements. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * It is nearly seven years since I got the article upgraded to GA and after that I had retired from Wikpedia. I am now back to editing since 3 January 2023.
 * I have started fixing references to uncited paras. I have already done a few. Hope to the Transporation section fully soon.  Nvvchar . 11:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I have now fixed all the references for the transporation section. Pl let me know if iave left out any unreferencced section.  Nvvchar . 13:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * It looks good though I would like for some other people to check and see if the article is GA status now. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * At the lower end of the criteria, but it probably does meet them. On that basis, keep, although I would recommend putting the article down at WP:GOCE, . AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Who should do it? The person who has put it up for reaasseemnt should do it, I suppose.  Nvvchar . 14:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Doesn't really matter, just as long as some effort is being made to improve clarity and readability. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)