Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Python (programming language)/1

Python (programming language)

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Python_(programming_language)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: No improvemnent, so delisted. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

A 2007 listing of a still in-use programming language; no surprise that huge amounts of material is unsourced, violating GA criterion 2. I also feel that too much detail is being paid to the syntax of the language, possibly violating criterion 3b). AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * See above for further issues. No harm in starting the reassessment now. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @AirshipJungleman29: can you notify the major contributors, reviewers and initial nominator? Pings may be missed, and I only pinged those with over 5% authorship. Feel free to remove this comment afterwards. Femke (alt) (talk) 14:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Perhaps too.  AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * , this article annoyingly dates to before the days of nominator/reviewer. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not a major contributor to this article, I just ran a couple of bots on it.  Abductive  (reasoning) 14:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not a major contributor to this article, I just ran a couple of bots on it.  Abductive  (reasoning) 14:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)