Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Rancho Bravo Tacos/1

Rancho Bravo Tacos

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Rancho_Bravo_Tacos/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Second review also found no issues. Furthermore, no one has expressed any significant concerns with the article - certainly nothing that would necessitate a delist. Anything else can be resolved through normal editing processes, or at FAC if that's in the cards. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm not doubting the quality of this article, but it was reviewed by a new user who did not give an in-depth assessment. I only would like to ensure that it receives this. An anonymous username, not my real name 01:29, 18 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Great! No problem. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll perform a de facto GA review here. I am familiar with @Another Believer's work and have little question of the article quality. I applaud User:An anonymous username, not my real name for their diligence in catching that review so quickly.
 * Copy-vios- Only quotes flagged on Earwig. Random spot-checking finds nothing.
 * Sourcing- nothing of note, fixed some missing citation info
 * Images- descriptions could be more specific, image rights are in order
 * Prose- MOS:CITELEAD should be removed, all other issues I cleaned up on my own.
 * @An anonymous username, not my real name I've given this page a solid look through. There are a handful of issues that @Another Believer should address but nothing that immediately would warrant the page being delisted. If you want to close this discussion I'll leave that up to you, I personally give this a Strong keep. Etrius ( Us) 04:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)