Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Raoul Wallenberg/2

Raoul Wallenberg
I noticed that this article had accumulated a few unsourced statements since 2008, when it was promoted. Also, the section on awards and honors was growing so bloated (and poorly sourced) that it has now been spun off into a separate article (List of honours dedicated to Raoul Wallenberg). A well-sourced summary is therefore needed here, since Wallenberg did receive a lot of awards. It has also been alleged that the article gives undue weight to dissenting views that he didn't die in 1947. I hope these relatively minor concerns can be addressed so this stays a GA. Catrìona (talk) 16:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Raoul_Wallenberg/2&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delist Valid concerns that have not been addressed four months. Some may be minor, but the lack of the honours section seems to be a clear failure of the broadness criteria AIRcorn (talk) 08:04, 12 December 2018 (UTC)