Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sabancaya/1

Sabancaya

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Sabancaya/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: No violations of the criteria apparent. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

I just notably expanded/rewrote the article, so it might need a re-assessment. I am especially unsatisfied with the prose, which is overly wordy. I'd like to present it to FAC in the future, so this needs to be tip-top. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I mean, keeping in mind that GAR isn't PR and is really meant to assess if egregious violations of the GA criteria can be fixed, I think you're fine. About the most wordy sentence in the article is ; it's still perfectly understandable, if a little verbose. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 06:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)