Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/San Marino national football team/1

San Marino national football team

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/San_Marino_national_football_team/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Citations missing, especially for statistics, which fails 2b of the GA criteria. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

A GA from 2010. Has been tagged for "This article or section appears to be slanted towards recent events. (May 2022) This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2022)" for almost a year. GA cleanup reports "Unsourced passages need footnotes (May 2022), ... (May 2022), Unsourced passages need footnotes (May 2022), Link rot cleanup (June 2022)" Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree that the page generally needs more citations overall. If needed, I can help retrieve adequate sources in Italian. Oltrepier (talk) 13:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * so, there are three CN tags that need addressing and a few uncited paragraphs in the section above. The latest fixtures and competitive records need citing. I also believe the "all time record" section is CRUFT and needs removing.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Lee Vilenski I agree about the competitive records and the paragraphs. The fixtures should already have citations, though, and the "List of matches not lost" could still be relevant, given San Marino's competitive history... Oltrepier (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I think we are quite a way away from actually picking this up. I have posted a link on WT:FOOTY. If no one picks this up, then we'd be pretty placed to close and delist.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Should List of matches not lost by San Marino not be moved to San Marino national football team results rather than being on the main page? It could be linked from the Reputation section as well. Felixsv7 (talk) 14:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Felixsv7 You're probably right: I didn't notice it at first, but that section makes the article a bit bloated... Oltrepier (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)