Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sister Wives/1

Sister Wives

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Sister_Wives/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Discussion
I used the table above to explain my reasoning for listing this article for good article community reassessment. Please discuss here. Many thanks - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 09:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * , apart from the trivial divorce section, I honestly don't see anything that unforgivable with the article. Keep AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * ,, any thoughts? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The article isn't that bad, at least from an initial viewing. Maybe it's not broad enough but I don't have enough knowledge to tell. though I would like for
 * "As polygamous marriage is not legally recognized in the US, there are no divorce documents to date the end of relationships. The end of a relationship is instead reckoned by announcements, and events such as moving away."
 * To be cited before I say keep. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The lead needs fixing. The second paragraph is totally unsourced and doesn't appear anywhere in the body. The first paragraph doesn't appear in the body either, although there is a source. The lead simultaneously needs expansion to summarize the body, it doesn't touch on most sections. CMD (talk) 14:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC)