Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Switzerland/1

Switzerland

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Switzerland/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Four editors make a strong consensus for delisting. Huge amounts of work needed for regaining GA status; would suggest that a greater emphasis be placed on high-quality books and reliable scholarly articles. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Made a GA in 2010 and last assessed back in 2013. This article has major sourcing problems with massive amounts of uncited material. This will need to be addressed for this article to remain a GA. Also its lead is way too long. MOS:LEAD dictates that a lead should be four paragraphs. This has seven. So that will also need to change. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delist I wholeheartedly disargee with the original passing but there's no need to flog a decade-old review. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 00:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

I concur that this article does not meet the good article criteria. In addition to the things said above, there are many instances of poor writing and short paragraphs. Steelkamp (talk) 04:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)