Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Signpost/1

The Signpost

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/The_Signpost/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted. Hopefully someone will take this up in future making sure to cite only reliable sources. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  19:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Citations not up to standard for a GA. Flalf Talk 17:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I want to add on to this: all of the references to the wikipedia signpost violate WP:PRIMARY and WP:USERG. Good Articles should not be breaking policy or official guidelines. JackFromWisconsin (talk &#124; contribs) 17:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * As much as I hate to say it, I must agree with the above. Sources to primary sources and Wikipedia too much. I say Delist. Link20XX (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , definitively not. There are 21 Wikipedia references out of 58, plus. So there are 37 independent sources. That's more than enough for a GA.  Gerald WL  02:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)