Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Tale of Peter Rabbit/1

The Tale of Peter Rabbit

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/The_Tale_of_Peter_Rabbit/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Consensus to close review as keep. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  19:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Same issue as the others from Contributor copyright investigations/ItsLassieTime where a sock wrote about 2/3 of the article including all the important stuff, it was passed without a real look at anything, and will require a lot of work to return to GA status. Wizardman 01:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I've extended and cited the Publication history (moving the refs out of the lead), and am adding a Reception section now. The Plot section is probably acceptable as it is. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Given the work done so far and the comments here as well as at the talk page I'm leaning towards withdrawing the GAR, though I'll try and read through the full article first before doing so to be on the safe side. It helps when multiple people who I trust more than many on the site are giving it a clean bill of health. Wizardman 00:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)


 * That's very kind of you. I'm happy to do more if there's anything that people want. I've asked VictoriaEarle if she'd like to join in with any of the text she checked and reworked way back when. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * : says she's busy just now but hopes to get back to it someday. I think we have the article covering "the main points" as required for GA so unless there's more that you feel immediately needs doing, we might close this GAR now? Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * After reading through it, I'm ok with having this closed as keep, so I'll let the GAR coordinators do their thing on it. Wizardman  16:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)