Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Thin Lizzy/1

Thin Lizzy

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Thin_Lizzy/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review

Result: Article kept as GA after improvements AustralianRupert (talk) 00:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry, guys, but there is an alarming number of "page needed" templates (a total count of 54) in here which have remained unaddressed for two months. They are relevant, and the original nominator may be able to fix these easily, but if that can't happen, this article should be delisted. There are also five dead links in the article. I'm open to what the rest of the community thinks.  danny music editor  Speak up! 22:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Dead links have all been replaced or now have archive links. The page details I have to leave to others. ww2censor (talk) 11:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I can deal with the 'page needed' tags; I was discussing it with the guy who put them there but he hasn't got back to me for a while. Should get it done today. Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I think I've dealt with all the 'page numbers needed' tags. There might be a few more page numbers I can add that aren't tagged; I'll look at that when I can. Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, seem to have forgotten about this. Thank god we still have you around after five more years, Breton. It'd have been difficult to fix without you. I know the tags were only two months old as opposed to something like six, but they were so many in number that I immediately brought it to GAR; I would never let an article with 54 tags stand as a GA, especially Thin Lizzy. I will now gladly keep this article.  danny music editor  Speak up! 00:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Much appreciated. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)