Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Tokyo Mirage Sessions ♯FE/1

Tokyo Mirage Sessions ♯FE

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Tokyo_Mirage_Sessions_%E2%99%AFFE/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Speedily kept. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Possible spelling errors, the development section might not be detailed enough for this type of article. reassesment in response to sandy georgia requesting a GAR. --Therealgamer1234 (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Just checking, did you actually suggest this? --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I put in a GAR request for someone to check, as I am not that familiar with GA standards, and I wondered if the article had been damaged during the socking shenanigans. If you, as the principle editor, feel it is still good, that's good with me!  I didn't think the GAR request would be acted on without someone eyeballing it first, considering the SPI. Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  21:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy close, nominated by blocked user, perhaps as some kind of WP:POINT. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy close per Axem. I haven't taken a very thorough look at the article, but it appears good enough to be a video game GA. ProtoDrake does a good job making GAs, and it looks to be up to standard.  The Night Watch     (talk)   05:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)