Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ward Churchill/1

Ward Churchill

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Ward_Churchill/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found
 * Result: Delisted. Femke (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Lack of citations, cleanup banners, lack of updates on post-2009 work, poor prose in areas (elaboration on the talk page) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  12:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment. The "Writings" section definitely needs a trim / citation update that only uses primary source references as extra backup.  That said, I'm not convinced "lack of updates on post-2009 work" is a problem.  Google News seems to show that the only notable thing that happened after 2009 was the Supreme Court rejecting his appeal in 2013 - which is already in the article - and him showing up at U Colorado Boulder for a single 90-minute speaking / venting session in 2017, which was barely newsworthy and really just an excuse to tell his story again.  Everything else seems to be retrospectives talking about the original incident, the 9/11 deal, and so on.  It seems like he hasn't really done much of anything notable since 2009.  (To be clear, I agree that the prose & citations in writing sections still need to be fixed for the article to stay a GA - just not the "comprehensive" concern.)  SnowFire (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  19:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delist. No edits on the article after a month, problems remain unresolved.  SnowFire (talk) 03:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delist - this must be delisted, no improvements on warranted and reasonable buidhe and SnowFire suggestions.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99°  03:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)