Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Washington State Convention Center/1

Washington State Convention Center

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Washington_State_Convention_Center/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept No reason to delist has been given and another editor found no major issues AIRcorn (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

This article was never properly reviewed having a flyby note by a new editor on their 12th edit who's not even sure who the nominator or reviewer is. Surprise this "flu" under the radar lol.-- Moxy 🍁 23:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Irrespective of how the reviewer conducted the review, I'm not seeing any major issues here. I'll formally assess this against the GA criteria:
 * The history section is the longest section in the article (I'd estimate conservatively that it is about 60% of the entire article). However, a lot of GA's about architecture topics are like this, especially with a topic whose construction has been as drawn out as the WSCC, so it is focused. As for the other issues, I examined the article and am not seeing any egregious zingers, though maybe there are a few long paragraphs. epicgenius (talk) 20:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Saw you had some activity on the talk page, informing you of this if you did not see it.   Kees08  (Talk)   20:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)