Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Water cycle/1

Water cycle

 * • Watch article reassessment page
 * Result: Individually delisted by Thegreatdr Geometry guy 15:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The lead is not comprehensive enough for the article, and there are relatively few inline references for the article. I'm not sure this article met the previous GA criteria when it was passed 1.6 years ago. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Would you be willing to delist this yourself, following the delisting guidelines? It doesn't seem necessary to have a fully fledged GAR, as I don't think such an action could reasonably be disputed. Geometry guy 21:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed, it will be best of you de-list the article. It's clearly not GA material. Majoreditor (talk) 02:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok. Just wanted a second opinion.  It shall be done.  Thegreatdr (talk) 03:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)