Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Wisconsin Highway 29/1

Wisconsin Highway 29

 * Article (Edit &middot; History) &middot; Article talk (Edit &middot; History) &middot; Watch article &middot; Watch article reassessment page
 * Result: Procedural close. Article has been reinserted in the nominations queue. Geometry guy 12:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I request reassessement of the recently failed Wisconsin Highway 29 article.

The reviewer failed the article stating the following: "I failed this, not because of any minor points like mileposts, but because the source for the history is not a reliable source. --NE2 01:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)" I request reassessment for the following reasons:
 * 1) He failed to tell me which source he believes is unreliable - since there are several sources in that section, leaving me to wonder what's going on.
 * 2) Though it is reviewer's discretion, an opportunity should be given to improve the page by finding a more reliable source if it was this one small matter.
 * 3) The reviewer regularly edits articles of this type and is a member of WikiProject U.S. Roads, thereby creating a Conflict of Interest


 * article talk page diff
 * GAN diff

—  master son T - C 03:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * "Wisconsin Highways" is not a reliable source. I figured that would be clear; sorry. --NE2 04:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Changed —  master son T - C 20:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm going to need to get some additonal sources tonight —  master son T - C 20:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Though I'm making this correction this does not address items 2 and 3 yet. —  master son T - C 21:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * This reassessment is closely related to the reassessment of Interstate 70 in Utah: the GA fail was a procedural mistake and a probable conflict of interest. However, as improvements are being made, others may want to propose listing this article. If they do not, I will restore it in its original place at GAN. I hope it will be fixed and listed! Geometry guy 23:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Also New York State Route 174. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm aware of that one too. Geometry guy 23:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Seeing although NE2's actions was not correct, I bothered fixing NY 174 and am gonna send it to GAN instead of relisting it. A review from a non-USRD may be better than just a listing.Mitch32contribs 23:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's fine, although I may readjust the date and move it up the list, if that is okay with you. Geometry guy 00:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Done (set for december 28).Mitch32contribs 02:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Do what you want. I thought I'd help but apparently that didn't happen. --NE2 00:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, you helped me find errors I didn't see. Mitch32contribs 02:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm closing this, now. I would note that the lead needs expansion to summarize the article adequately. Geometry guy 12:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)