Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Zytglogge/1

Zytglogge

 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Zytglogge/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Kept all cn tags have been addressed. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Some unsourced content. I have contacted the original nominator, and if they are willing, the article's GA status will be secure. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I cannot identify the grounds for this request. "Some unsourced content" is exceedingly unspecific. In view of this discussion, I will address specific concerns that editors other than the nominator have.  Sandstein   18:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Femke, in the discussion linked to above you asked about the two cn tags. From context and content I assume that I took these statements from Bellwald (1983), but I don't have the physical book and checking it out from the library again would be too much of a hassle, so I've deleted these sentences and the tags.  Sandstein   18:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Brilliant. Thanks. You can find out if they were cited at the moment of insertion with Who Wrote That. Great gadget to avoid having to find sources back again. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)