Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2011 June 21

= June 21 =

Editing a table to the side of an article??
In the article "timeline of same sex marriage", the tables to the right first list countries that recognize same-sex marriage. However, the list does not include Nepal. How do I edit that table to the right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dketcher (talk • contribs) 02:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Do you have a reliable source? Same-sex marriage in Nepal doesn't say so. Timeline of same-sex marriage contains . This code transcludes a template. Template:SSM redirects to Template:Same-sex unions which is semi-protected so it can only be edited by autoconfirmed users. You can post a suggestion to Template talk:Same-sex unions. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Go to the bottom of the table (where it says LGBT portal) and find the “e”. Click it and you can edit. As said above, you need a source, and you need to learn table formatting.


 * Also, in Article:Nepal, Sections 3.1 and 5 (Neotectonics and Subdivisions, respectively) need fixing (pictures, some kind of wrap problem) Thanks! A comment by a person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010. (talk) 00:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Electric Ink
For some time Electric Ink has been shown as a BBC programme when it is in actual fact the company name of a graphic design company started many many years before the BBC even conceived their programme. The true Electric Ink has amended the page (more than once) whilst still leaving all of the content referring to the BBC programme to avoid offence, but each time the real Electric Ink's content is subsequently edited out - why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennislindridge (talk • contribs) 07:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * If you make legal threats, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia. If previous edits have been reverted, it is probably because no references were given to support the assertion being made. - David Biddulph (talk) 08:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, if you are talking about a different entity from that covered by the existing article, it would need a separate article, but you must not write it, as this would be a breach of WP:COI. For such a new article to be accepted, the relevant rules on notability would need to be satisfied. - David Biddulph (talk) 08:12, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I reverted your addition to Electric Ink. Although it may be true, it was not written in an encyclopedic tone. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I left you a message on your talk page. If you need help with something, feel free to ask here or on my talk page. Cheers. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 08:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what the Electric Ink is that you refer to as the "real" Electric Ink. Both your EI and the BBC programme are as "real" as anything else.  If, for lack of a better description, your Electric Ink is notable then it could go in an article titled Electric Ink (company) or Electric Ink (tattoo parlor) or some such title.  But like I said, it must be notable first.  See Notability for more on that.  Dismas |(talk) 08:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Something dodgy with my edits
I've just been editing [|Wayne Schoenfeld] and with each edit some aspect of the article which I have not altered is changed. I'm going to try to correct this, but is there some sort of bug that would be causing this? I don't want a virus on my end to compromise the article (which needs a lot of work). P.Oxy.2354 (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Actually, is there an admin who could simply rollback to before my first edit from today? The article is a mess, now. Thank you, P.Oxy.2354 (talk) 09:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * That doesn't need an admin; I have done it for you. Perhaps you accidentally hit "Edit" at the top while looking at an old revision of the page? That would discard all the edits made since that revision. See Help:Revert. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for the help and info! P.Oxy.2354 (talk) 09:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Have I made a posting for review
Hi, I saved the following page the other day but was it actually posted for Review or not?

Thanks,

SRW

Farinomalein - a natural maleimide with formula C10H13NO4 - was first isolated from the entomopathogenic fungus Isaria farinosa (Paecilomyces farinosus) - source H599 (Japan).

Potential as a Biological Insecticide
Farinomalein has shown potent and selective inhibition (0.15-5 μg/disk) against eight isolates of plant pathogenic Phytophthora sojae (P. Putri et. al.). These results suggest that farinomalein might be useful as a candidate pesticide for the treatment of Phytophthora stem rot in soybean.

Material Synthesis
A simple two-stage synthesis from the γ-hydroxybutenolide compound, 5-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-5(H)-furanone, has been reported. Firstly, 5-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-5(H)-furanone is oxidised to 3-isopropylfuran-2,5-dione by Dess–Martin periodinane, followed by acetic acid reflux with beta-alanine. The white powdered product has a melting point of 75-77°C.

POSTAL CODE
Hi there,

Please may i have the postal code of Flying Blue in Paris, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.223.143.226 (talk) 14:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 6 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck.-- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Ummm...this isnt the place to ask that so find it yourself. And I tried finding it i cant so your out of luck. Or how about try 1234567890 :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Since 6.18.2011 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This question properly belongs at the reference desk, but Flying Blue is located at F-94852 Ivry-Sur-Seine cedex France.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Fuhghettaboutit/Forget About It, thanks. 41.223.143.226, remeber to go to the reference desk next time so we don't have to deal with you. Because, its a hard job being a Wikipedian. Thank you. A comment by a person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010. (talk) 00:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Orange Mike thanks. It's OVER 3⅔ million.

Inline citations
I would like to know how to do inline citations, so that people can click a numberical subscript and this takes them immediately to an external link. Any advice would be most welcome, and you are welcome to leave a message on my userpage. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I suggest you read Help:Footnotes or Tutorial/Citing sources. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Some other suggestions which could be useful: Citation templates, Referencing for beginners and Referencing for beginners with citation templates. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 15:48, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you or this - I keep on trying the referencing tag which is implicit on one of these pages of Wikipedia, but keep on getting "Citation missing  - go to helpage". What am I doing wrong? All advice will be appreciated. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, external links in the body of an article such as you describe are to be eliminated; there is no place for them in our model of referencing. They should either be references, or external links at the end of the article. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:59, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Using will produce. You then need to add in a section named 'References' like in the following example:

==References==

To give the link a better name rather than 1 you can use something like

See also Citing sources. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 21:08, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you every one for all your help, especially Toshi Yamaguchi - at last, I seem to be getting somewhere! This is exciting - after editing Wikipedia for many years, at long last I might be learning inline citations! ACEOREVIVED (talk) 14:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

moving new short article to article space
I'm also having the same problem that was fixed on June 19th:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk#moving_new_short_article_to_article_space

I'm not able to move a short new article into article space. I have an article at User:Cdbahls/Cif that should be at CFTR_Inhibitory_Factor (or even in place of Cif should it be deemed acceptable to rename/redirect the cleaning product).

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdbahls (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You have so few edits under your belt that you're not yet authorized to do that; I've moved it for you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

great, thank you!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdbahls (talk • contribs) 15:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, please remember to use proper grammar and sign your posts with four tildes (4x ~). It will automatically convert into your username. Thanks! A comment by a person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010. (talk) 00:07, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Robert Jordan redirect
I don't think Robert Jordan should redirect to the Robert Jordan it currently is. At the very least, it should go to a disambiguation page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.69.199.133 (talk) 15:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Why? He's overwhelmingly the best-known person using that name. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * In lockstep with the above, see Disambiguation (WP:PRIMARYTOPIC).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Template:TonyAward PlayLeadActor below command not working
At TonyAward PlayLeadActor, the below command is not working.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed, I think. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:59, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Instant deleting
If I see a section of an article that looks bias, inapropriate or too opinionated is it ok to just delete or do I need to go to the discussion page about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.130.18.108 (talk) 19:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You can delete it, but be sure to explain in your edit summary why you did so, citing the policy in question, such as "non-neutral point of view", "irrelevant to this article", "unsourced attack" or whatever; and assume good faith on the part of the person who put it in. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Mike is exactly right, you can do it and an edit summary is strongly encouraged, otherwise, someone may assume it is vandalism, revert and warn you. I prefer to go a little further, and post a notice on the talk page that I intended to make some change, just to give people a chance to respond. It may be that there has been a long discussion, and this is consensus wording, or perhaps there is an ongoing discussion, and people are working out wording, in which case just deleting it may be a bit disruptive. -- SPhilbrick  T  21:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Amount of Non-free image per article
Where is the guidelines that dictate how many non-free images can be used on an article? I really need them in regards to the Bugs Bunny article dispute. Sarujo (talk) 22:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The policy is at WP:NFCC. There is no limit, but per #8 each must significantly increase reader understanding, and per #3 multiple images can't be used if one will serve the purpose. —teb728 t c 23:11, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * How would this help with the situation on the Bugs Bunny article? They are insisting on including this one on the claim that they feel it's crucial to illustrate his appearance on The Looney Tunes Show. Personally I don't see how that design is that far removed from the design we all know so well. Sarujo (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * If the purpose is to show how Bugs Bunny looks, it would fail NFCC#3, for there are other images that do that. If it is (as appears to be the case) to decorate a mention of the 2011 show, it would fail NFCC#8. If it were to significantly increase reader understanding of sourced commentary on, for example, how the current appearance differs from the classical, then it would be acceptable. —teb728 t c 23:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * That's the thing the image doesn't reflect the actual design in the actual show, as seen in this screenshot. As you can see, there not any real difference. But you're right this is a fail of criteria. Sarujo (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)