Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2016 February 6

= February 6 =

Bullock family
Please help - I am unsure of the correct ORIGINAL publisher to use for refs numbers 8 and 9 on this page. They are the same resource. Please leave in the quotes - including the one that is highlighted. Thanks 101.182.136.195 (talk) 04:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * You will normally find the name of the publisher at the front of the book. The name of the original publisher is shown on page 9 of the file you were looking at.  For other advice regarding the publisher parameter, see the section  above. --David Biddulph (talk) 06:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

It is hard for me to find the title page re the queery - I know I will muck it up if I do it myself. Please help.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.182.136.195 (talk) 06:59, 6 February 2016‎ (UTC)


 * For advice about not starting a new thread on the same question see the section above.  I have merged into the previous thread. And please remember to sign your messages. --David Biddulph (talk) 07:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Please I cannot do the clever edit suggested by Biddulph - who was very understanding- please see above query re this page. Thanks 101.182.136.195 (talk) 07:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Yet again you started a new thread on the same question, despite the advice here, and in the previous thread, and countless times previously. Again I have merged.  If you would prefer advice in a launguage other than English, perhaps you ought to be editing a different language's Wikipedia. --David Biddulph (talk) 07:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear David b. - I am sorry that I cannot do the edit. No, although English is not my native tongue, I am fine to try to do the editing on the English pages. Sorry David 101.182.136.195 (talk) 07:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * (Yet another new section, now combined here)

I am sorry that I upset David Biddulph but he says that the name of the publisher of the resource I mentioned earlier this evening; The name of the original publisher is shown on page 9

I cannot go all the way back to the early pages to get the correct way of documentation for refs. 9 and 10

Please help - I have tried and failed. I'm sorry. 101.182.136.195 (talk) 08:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I've added the publisher (Hurst and Blackett) along with the author and year, as requested. Hope this helps. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 16:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

New article ratings
Hi, i want to get article ratings (A,B,C etc) for a couple of new articles, and some feedback if possible. Where would be the right place to ask for something like that? Thanks. prokaryotes (talk) 04:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC
 * Hi Since anyone can more or less review articles, there's no formal process for requesting assesments. You could try making a post on the talk page of relevant WikiProjects (e.g. if I wanted to have Elephant reviewed, I could make a post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mammals). ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 07:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * For getting general feedback on an article, Peer review is also an option. It is backlogged however, and receiving feedback may take some time. ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 07:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the infos SuperHamster. prokaryotes (talk) 09:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Edits on other Wikipedias that mirror my edits here?
Hi help desk,

Not sure if this is the best place for this question, but I'm seeing some strange things in my Global User Contributions. There are a number of edits attributed to me on other Wikipedias that look to mirror edits I made on enwiki, but which I most definitely did not make anywhere else. For example, here I actually made this edit, reverting vandalism at Mick Fanning. That edit also appears on dewiki. It also says I nominated an article for deletion on dewiki, which I nominated here on enwiki. There are several like this. mlwiki, arzwiki, etc.

I'm going to guess this has something to do with "SUL: Account not attached." that I see next to those projects in the Contributions list linked above?

What's actually happening here? &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 23:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * These pages were imported from enwiki to dewiki. In the process, your edits here were duplicated on the pages they created there during import.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * aha! Thanks. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 13:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)