Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2016 January 24

= January 24 =

Eden Rock, St Barths
Please check that I am not "doubling up" on refs 3 through to 7 on the above page. thanks101.182.146.167 (talk) 01:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, you are doubling-up. Help:Referencing for beginners tells you what to do. --David Biddulph (talk) 01:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks - I will enlist one of my students to TRY to do it. Cheers 101.182.146.167 (talk) 01:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Please help if you can - we find this difficult - sorry.

Referencing errors on Australia Act 1986
Reference help requested.

I've inserted in the infobox the basic legislation information for the Australian and UK versions of the Act, which are formally independent of each other (the circumstances are explained in the article). The two versions need to appear separately in the infobox, but I can't make that work properly. Please help.

Thanks, Wikiain (talk) 02:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * You need to remember that the parameters available for Template:Infobox legislation are not the same as those for Template:Infobox UK legislation. - David Biddulph (talk) 02:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you David. They were already in use separately, which I have continued.  There doesn't seem to be a Template:Infobox Australian legislation or, so far I can tell thus far, any need for one.  Wikiain (talk) 03:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Glen Affric and Eden Rock, St Barths
Please check both of these pages - I have done my best but my students say the pages  "could be better"... (re refs.) Thanks 101.182.146.167 (talk) 06:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Your students are right. They probably realise that what should go in the " " parameter is the name of the publisher, where relevant, as it says at Template:Cite web, not things like " ".  Not surprisingly, the date, where there is one, belongs in the " " parameter.  Also, they've probably read the advice in the section  above, about the same reference being used more than once.  Why not let your students correct the problems, under supervision, and show you what they've done? - 81.153.132.129 (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

It is very hard for any of us here to get that correct on both pages referenced above. We would appreciate your expert input so that our  Wikipedia pages are "correct". Thanks

Reference not taken
we have created a page and reference for the same is given at the end of page. however, the reference has not been considered ex:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vibhastudent (talk • contribs) 07:41, 24 January 2016‎ (UTC)


 * Your wikitext says:
 * Try removing the surplus tags outside the inner  pair. --David Biddulph (talk) 07:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Try removing the surplus tags outside the inner  pair. --David Biddulph (talk) 07:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Eden Rock, St Barths
Hi there - I cannot fix up the doubling up of ref 4 and 10 on this page. Too worrying that I will muck it all up. Please help. Also - is the page ==Glen Affric==  all OK? Please help. 101.182.146.167 (talk) 08:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I fixed the doubly-used reference on Eden Rock for you, see the diff for how I did it. Nothing blatant jumps out for Glen Affric, what do you suspect might be wrong?  Rwessel (talk) 08:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * See the reply to the IP's question at above. The parameters    and   do not break the syntax of the citation template but they suggest that the IP did not read the reply. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much Rwessel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.182.146.167 (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2016‎ (UTC)

Glen Affric
We are worried that there is a lack of citations/refs. for example - the musician reference at the end. What do you think? Thanks101.182.146.167 (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * In general, everything not obviously correct ("the sky is blue") should be referenced. See WP:REF.  Of course there are many cases where articles fall short of that standard, but that doesn't change the standard.  As for the particular sentence, I'd be tempted to consider it trivia and not worthy of inclusion in the article without further explanation (why is it relevant/important?).  Rwessel (talk) 09:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Could you please remove the Chris Watson ref on the Glen Affric page. I agree with Rwessel # it is indeed trivia and not sourced. Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.182.146.167 (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2016‎
 * ✅ but this is Wikipedia - you could do that yourself. Rwessel (talk) 12:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

how I can add reference link?
How can I add reference linl to article? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strad21 (talk • contribs) 13:25, 24 January 2016‎ (UTC)


 * Try WP:Referencing for beginners. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

2009 dura max
2009 dura max 4 door p0708 code replaced mode swicth did not help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.54.147 (talk • contribs)
 * I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 5 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

publishing
I wrote an article and it keeps getting taken down. I would really like to publsish it. I cant find the proper tutorials that I need on youtube to find how to make the improvements needed. I don't know what im missing I have footnotes and things it asked for but still cant put it up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie Cambel (talk • contribs) 16:09, 24 January 2016‎ (UTC)
 * Assuming that you are talking about ‎Jaliet Caprana, the reasons for deletion were explained in standard messages left on your talk page. As you have blanked the page a number of times, you may need to use the  to review them properly.  The major reasons given for deletion so far are CSD A7 (WP:NOTABILITY), CSD G11 (WP:SPAM), and CSD G12 (WP:COPYVIO).  You will need to address all of those issues before the article can be published on Wikipedia.  The copyright violations, in particular, are a major issue (N.B. I have been forced to nominate User:Jamie Cambel/sandbox for WP:CSD G12 as well).  I will include the generic article creation standard advice template below, as it has a number of links which may help you.


 * Before creating an article, please search Wikipedia first to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Please also review a few of our relevant policies and guidelines with which all articles should comply. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles must not contain original research, must be written from a neutral point of view, should cite reliable sources which verify their content and must not contain unsourced, negative content about living people.


 * Articles must also demonstrate the notability of the subject. Please see our subject specific guidelines for people, bands and musicians, companies and organizations and web content and note that if you are closely associated with the subject, our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends against you creating the article.


 * If you still think an article is appropriate, see Your first article. You might also look at How to write a great article for guidance, and please consider taking a tour through the Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation. An Article Wizard is also available to walk you through creating an article.
 * Murph 9000 (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Since you appear to be writing about yourself, you should also read Autobiography: People are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves on Wikipedia. —teb728 t c 23:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Referencing errors on Numerical Stroop effect
Reference help requested.

Hi, I was trying to make a redirect for the "numericial stroop effect". Sometimes it's called "numerical stroop task" or "Numerical stroop" or "Size congruency effect", but it's the same Idea. how can I fix the errors?

Thanks, Zahira Cohen (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Zahira Cohen. I don't understand the issue because before posting this question you successfully figured out how to create redirects from the first two alternate names you listed above (though you didn't create one for the third) which are functioning fine. Meanwhile, the title of your question implies the issue is actually a referencing error, but I don't see any error messages in the references shown in the article.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I think Zahira is trying to figure out the correct page name. Generally, a Wikipedia article should be named after the most commonly used name of the subject (see also WP:COMMONNAME). If there are several synonynous terms though (these are no "errors"), we should just create redirects to one specific title. In this case I'd say we should go with the term that is most commonly used by academic publications. De728631 (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Ryan Lindsay (actor)
Assistance needed to drop (actor) from title (Ryan Lindsay (actor)) and URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Lindsay_(actor) My colleague has been inactive and his career status has been updated.

Thanks in advance, Nate NathanJBeckham (talk) 20:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Nate. We can't simply remove "(actor)" from his page, as there is another Ryan Lindsay out there, so the name links to what we call a "disambiguation" page listing the various articles, and all people with that name are required to have "(something)" in the name of their article and the URL for it.  Secondly, it appears that you have a conflict of interest, due to your direct connection with Ryan, so it is generally inappropriate for you to be directly editing his article.  You are, however, quite welcome to provide feedback on the article's talk page. If you have any links to good independent reliable sources, with information on this latest phase of his career, that could be quite useful in bringing the article up to date.  Do you have a suggestion for what should be used after his name?  Should it be changed to "(screenwriter)", or something else?   Murph 9000  (talk) 20:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Per WP:TWODABS it's not clear to me why a disambiguation page is necessary. Disambiguation could be dealt with by hatnotes.--ukexpat (talk) 01:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I do not have contact with Ryan, so "peer" more accurately describes our association. I watched him speak at a tech conference and this led me to his wiki, where I felt I could update his career achievements and highlights. I will look for citations when I get the time. Also, can you use his middle name (J) to keep it unique from the other pages? That's how he introduced himself. Thanks User:Murph9000, just trying to update inaccuracies.

How do I change misinformation on my Wikipedia page?
How do I change misinformation on my Wikipedia page? Bruckecat (talk) 23:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, the first thing to realise is that if you have any direct connection to the subject of the article, you have a conflict of interest, and are strongly discouraged from directly editing the article. Your first step should be to concisely and clearly raise your specific concerns on the article's talk page.  If the article in question is Bascove (which seems to be the only article you have edited), then post your concerns and comments at Talk:Bascove, as a first step.  Where we go from there depends exactly on what the specific issues are.  Just posting the concerns may be sufficient to get an independent editor to address them.  If you can provide any links to good independent reliable sources to support any of the changes you would like made, that would be a great help to speed the process along.  If my guesswork about the nature of your problem is incorrect, please provide some details.   Murph 9000  (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * On the article's talk page, explain what changes you are asking for and preceed it with Request edit template. You should not edit the article directly if you have conflict of interest in it. RudolfRed (talk) 23:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)