Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2017 May 12

= May 12 =

2017–18 NCAA men's division I Basketball season Template
Can You Transfer The 2017-18 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Template from the talk page to the draft page please. 2600:8803:7A00:976A:787A:9A4A:ACA3:7D45 (talk) 00:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Template:2017–18 NCAA Division I men's basketball conference season navbox. I recommend that you create a user account so you can do this yourself in the future. Other advantages are that edits stay connected to an account, and you can built a reputation, instead of being connected to a more dynamic ip-adres. - Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

can i create Indian performing right society page now ?
Thanks for the help. i want to know that now i can create the said page or not ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Socialtags (talk • contribs) 03:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, you can. You have sufficient service time and so forth. You know how to make references and all. And the entity is probably notable.


 * You are recommended to go to Articles for creation and work from there. You don't have to, but it will increase the changes of your article being accepted.


 * However, the main question you need to ask yourself "Am I really able to write about such a controversial body as the Indian Performing Rights Society"? You need to be able to be completely evenhanded. Set yourself the goal that, when you have finished making the article, a person reading will be completely unable to figure out what your opinion of the Indian Performing Rights Society is. Can you do that? If you can, you will be welcomed into our community as a colleague and a star. The details of stuff like correct formatting, all that is secondary. What we want is adherence to WP:NPOV (as well as WP:V, WP:BLP, and the other core policies.) Good luck and godspeed. Herostratus (talk) 04:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Why prohibit editing?
I come from China, I try to modify the Wikipedia page, why forbid me to edit, and I are carried out according to the objective facts of editing. This prohibits the editing effect is very great, I need a reason for the established objective fact, why Wikipedia will not stop the ban by human or computer automatic processing, please refer to the objective facts to the reply without official reply stereotype. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Man888888 (talk • contribs) 08:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , you are not prohibited from editing. But if you want to contribute to Wikipedia it is important to follow established policies. In particular, when you add content to an article, you must cite a suitable source – all Wikipedia content should be verifiable. You may find it helpful to go through the information at WP:Referencing for Beginners to see how best to do it.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  08:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * You are not prohibited from editing, but the way you edit is prohibited. And as you asked for a reason, User:Bbb23 gave the reason when protected the article oldid=779988599:
 * Protected "Coolpad Group": mixture of socking and conflicted promotional editing (...)
 * For more explanation please see Wikipedia policies at WP:NOTPROMOTION and at WP:VER with a subsection at WP:SOURCES.
 * See also WP:Sock puppetry. --CiaPan (talk) 09:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * socks and COI. Matthew_hk   t  c  13:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Purposeful Defaming
I am taking care of Wikipedia profile of Ismail Ibn Musa Menk (Mufti Ismail Menk) who is a renowned Islamic Scholar. The link of profile is at Ismail_ibn_Musa_Menk. There are some content writers who are working purposefully to defame him by quoting wrong and editing his article in a way that the reader is misguided and misinterpreted. Would like you to look into this matter on priority and seriously.

I am a journalist and the my username in Wikipedia is agi_wiki

Ansif Ashraf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agi wiki (talk • contribs) 09:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * For future reference in similar cases, polite discussion on the talk page of the article will achieve much more than legal threats.    D b f i r s   14:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ...but, since that person is described as homophobic by two reliable newspapers (the Huffington Post and the Independent), you will need damn good reliable sources stating the opposite before the mention is removed. Tigraan Click here to contact me 15:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ... Fair comment! I wasn't defending agi_wiki, or the subject of the article.    D b f i r s   19:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Including Sigiriya archaeological site
There are lots of archaeological sites in Sri Lanka, some are UNESCO protected, but not included in your site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.231.57.160 (talk) 10:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * We have five million articles. If you are suggesting a change then please say which change to which page. We do have an article about Sigiriya. See also World Heritage Sites of Sri Lanka and Category:World Heritage Sites in Sri Lanka. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, you can also add missing information about these sites yourself - everyone's contributions are welcome. Such information should be based on published reliable sources to be verifiable by other editors and readers. If you are interested in editing Wikipedia, I recommend to register an account. It makes editing on Wikipedia and communicating with others a lot easier (see Why create an account?). GermanJoe (talk) 13:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

PD-India-URAA
I wonder if the images at Miss Malini (a 1947 Indian film) fall under the criteria for PD-India-URAA? Because pictures older than 60 years in India fall under PD-India, but PD-India-URAA just complicates it further. I'm sure the film is completely in public domain since it is lost, the production studio is gone (it's founder died in 1969), and it couldn't have been copyrighted in 1996 when it was unlikely to have survived. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  13:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, let's trouble and request his views on this query.  Lourdes  16:44, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * And assuming Cipo is not available on weekends, I'll request who has significant experience in similar queries. Thanks.  Lourdes  05:23, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Assuming the film was published/made available to the public in 1947 and PD-India is the only applicable tag, it would be PD in India but not the US, and the URAA tag would not apply. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:42, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It is impossible to determine when the film (released 26 Sept. 1947) entered copyright over where. Anything Indian satisfies PD-India if it is older than 60 years, but per URAA, it should have been public domain on 1 January 1996. So will there be a day when the copyright will universally expire? How long do I have to wait for that? -- Kailash29792 (talk)  12:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Most likely, 2042. See WP:NUSC. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:22, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Company Page
A while back someone created a company page, not from our company, and didn't fully name our company correctly. Right now it states Utex Industries. But we are actually Utex Industries, Inc. How to we update this, and add in a logo and the right column information that other company pages have? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.91.182.194 (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Per Wikipedia's relevant naming conventions, legal suffixes are not included in article titles. Yunshui 雲 水 14:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Yet again, someone asks for help and gets severely bitten.

Yunshi, not only have you failed to answer their perfectly reasonable questions, but you've also nominated it for deletion.

I've listed some sources at the discussion, and I've requested that the logo be uploaded.

To the IP User from the company:

I suggest you first read Best practices for editors with close associations.

a) Yunshi is correct that Wikipedia avoids adding the "inc" (or "limited" or "incorporated" etc), for all such articles. The name of the page is unlikely to change.

b) I've already asked for the logo to be added, here, Files_for_upload.

c) Feel free to comment in Articles for deletion/UTEX Industries

81.168.78.73 (talk) 14:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Population density question
Does Wikipedia have a standard, or policy, to calculate population density? If so what, or where, is it? If not, what formula for calculating population density is acceptable? Which numbers (estimated vs. official census) are to be used in such calculation? Thank you for your time!——→StephenTS42 (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, in general, I would suggest using the standard formula of population per km2 or per mi2. With respect to which population figure is to be used in such a calculation, it would depend on the year that you are calculating the density for – an official census figure is almost always acceptable (and in cases where such figures are challenged by any editor, go by whatever consensus emerges on the talk page of the respective article). Hope this answers your query. Thanks. Lourdes  16:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Much thanks for your answer! When editing an article with an infobox settlement and the parameter population_density_sq_mi is set to auto it is apparent that the formula you mentioned is followed.  However, there are many cities with borders that extend over bodies of water (or other uninhabitable areas) that if the standard formula were used would result in a distortion of the actual population density.  I noticed that National Geographic uses a slightly different formula: number of people ÷ the area they occupy = population density.  In other words, only the area within the boundaries of a municipality that can be occupied by people is factored in the formula. I realize numbers can be entered manually into info-boxes, but another editor who follows strict adherence to argumentum ad antiquitatem, (i.e.: the way things have been done before) is hard to sell on the idea.  So, that is reason I am looking for, in Wikipedia, whatever formula is used or applied, if there is one. (It might help to persuade a change of mind: either mine or his.)  Thank you again for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by StephenTS42 (talk • contribs) 19:21, May 13, 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand. I don't know of any editing guideline with respect to population density. Editing as per precedent is a sensible option (which, you mention, is the logic that the opposing editor is apparently forwarding). You could consider taking up the issue again at the talk page of the relevant article and go by consensus on that page. In case you believe that the dispute cannot be resolved thus, you could follow the steps listed out at dispute resolution to reach a conclusion. A request for comment is also a sensible method to resolve such an editing issue that has not been resolved otherwise. You could consider starting an Rfc on the talk page of the relevant article, requesting the responses of our editors on how the population density should be calculated for that particular page. Thanks. Lourdes  05:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! ——→StephenTS42 (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

New article
i have posted a new article but it is not live? is there a period during which the article is checked before it goes live? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeynaawan (talk • contribs) 15:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The new article you posted wasn't POLYOXFEN by any chance, was it? Because that article was created by User:Green Health Advocates, but it's substantially the same as what you put on your user page.
 * At any rate, if by "live" you mean searchable by Google or other search engines, yes, there is a period of time during which articles are checked before they become indexed by search engines. As for that article, there were a number of problems with it, and someone has made the decision to redirect it to Mitragyna speciosa.
 * Before you try again I recommend you read your first article, which gives helpful advice for writing a Wikipedia article. Since this article involves a medical product, I recommend you read this page which provides guidance on sourcing for medical articles. Assuming you work for one of the companies developing this product, I recommend you read our guideline on managing a conflict of interest.  Lastly, once you have read and processed all that, I recommend you use the articles for creation process as they will help evaluate and check the article and guide its development.  Be aware that AFC can take a long time though. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The substance is called polyoxyfen, and is not normally printed in all-caps. I have moved the redirect to Polyoxyfen. Maproom (talk) 18:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Super Bowl Golden Shovel from Houston To Minnesota
What I cant find the date when the super bowl Golden Shovel was sent from Houston to Minnesota What date was that. 2600:8803:7A00:976A:CDCF:982F:CA9C:61F8 (talk) 16:35, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You might like to try asking at the Reference Desk. This page is for questions about how to use Wikipedia, but the Reference Desk is for questions about information on Wikipedia. Triptothecottage (talk) 04:09, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Page deleted on Alexandra Allred
Hello!

My name is Kerri Beckman and I wrote a page on the author and fitness expert, Alexandra Allred. It was deleted because I took information from alexandratheauthor.com. I wrote and designed the website and changed the wording on the Wikipedia page. I'd like to know if there is a way we can reverse this.

Thank you!

Best,

Kerri Beckman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerribeckman (talk • contribs) 18:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, if you are the copyright holder of that content, see WP:DCM for how to license that content so it can appear here. Crow  Caw  18:35, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Kerribeckman, you also need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that she meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to her, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what she claims or interviewing her. The text should be non-promotional and if you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

The sad and ironic part is that buried in the copyright violations and promotional language is a possibly notable athlete/reporter. I don't care about athletes, but somebody who does might be able to write a legitimate article about Allred. But that somebody obviously cannot be Kerri Beckman. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  01:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocking
About Scottish Wikipedia

Hello, can someone tell me how to "Unlock me" from certain wiki, i had been Blocked/Banned from editing from the Scottish Wikipedia, and i wanted to create a Scottish Gaelic article about Beard, can someone help me ? This ban is forever in Wikipedia ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerd1853 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * We can't help you here. Each Wikipedia is administered independently with its own rules.  On your talk page at the other Wikipedia, the block message will likely say how long the block is for and how (or if) you may appeal the block.  RudolfRed (talk) 19:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Looking at Nerd1853's talk page on Scots Wikipedia, I see it says "The'r nae text on this page the nou." Maybe ask at the Help Desk there. Maproom (talk) 19:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * But Nerd1853 is blocked at Gaelic Wikipedia, as explained (in English) on his talk page there. Maproom (talk) 19:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I hope that Nerd1853 understands the difference between Scottish English, Scots language, and Scottish Gaelic.   D b f i r s   19:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Can ProteinBoxBot be sent to a task?
Hello again. ProteinBoxBot created a page FCHO2 in 2008. It is not clear to me why a page for FCHO1 wasn't created at that time. Is there some way to tell the bot that it missed something and nudge it to create a page for FCHO1? Thank you. JeanOhm (talk) 20:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, you could post this query at User talk:ProteinBoxBot/Phase 3 or directly contact the team members managing the bot, namely, and . Thanks.  Lourdes  16:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Bots have managers! Cool! Thank you. JeanOhm (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)