Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 September 23

= September 23 =

Wikipedia Page
Hi there!

I am a manager and my client has found that he has a Wikipedia page which isn't published. I was wondering if you could help this process, as it is not possible to publish the page.

Here it is below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nick_Annas

Thanks!

Kind Regards,

Nick Annas's Team — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publishthisprofile123 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The page has been submitted and declined three times, and each time, the reasons were given. The last edit to the page (on August 25) removed the submittals and reasons, but did not fix the underlying problems, and the page has not been resubmitted. I suggest you check the page history to see all of this. If you or anyone in your organization intends to edit, please read and heed WP:PAID. We are happy to work with you if you adhere to our policies. The page gives the appearance of being created and developed by someone with a conflict of interest (WP:COI). That's quite alright as long as the COI is declared. Our "articles for creation" queue is backlogged, and all reviewers are volunteers who take on whatever the heck jobs attract their attention. Resubmitting a page that has been declined without first making a serious attempt to address the objections is likely to cause reviewers to ignore the article. -Arch dude (talk) 01:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello, Publishthisprofile123. It might help you to understand how to work with Wikipedia if I point out a couple of misconceptions that I think are inherent in the words you use. Please understand that your client does not "have a Wikipedia page": nobody in the world has a Wikipedia page. Wikipedia has articles about many subjects - at present it has a draft article about your client. It also does not publish profiles of anybody - it publishes articles. If the draft article about your client is in time accepted, it still won't be his article: he and his associates will have no control over the contents (though he, and you, will be welcome to make suggestions for improving it), and the bulk of its content should be based not on what he says or does, still less on what he want to have written, but on what people who have no connection with him have chosen to publish about him, whether approving or critical. My points may seem picky, but as I say, I think it will help you avoid frustration to take them on board. --ColinFine (talk) 08:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I would also note that accounts cannot be shared or represent a group; only one individual should be using your account. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I've left some helpful links on your user talk page. shoy (reactions) 17:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * This appears to be a role account for a marketing company called PublishThis. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  00:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Wedding of Princess Eugenie and Jack Brooksbank
I have  tried  to  add  a  sub-heading -  Jack  Brooksbank -  and  it  looks  all  wrong. Please fix  if you  have  time. Thankyou 175.33.45.21 (talk) 00:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed if is was meant to be at level 3.MB 01:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Thomas Coke, 2nd Earl of Leicester
I have  tried  to place the  coat of  arms  at the  top of the  page  but  failed. Please fix  -  a real  mess  -  sorry  175.33.45.21 (talk) 00:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You had it inside the infobox. That infobox already has a image, and doesn't support a second image or graphic, so I restore the article as it was with the coat below the infobox. MB 01:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

List of wedding guests of Prince William and Catherine Middleton
Ref number  70  is  in  red -  I  did  not  do it  and  find  it  hard  to  repair. Please   do  so  if  you  are  able. Thanks 175.33.45.21 (talk) 02:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The guideline is WP:REDLINK and the solution was to remove the link. I did that. Johnuniq (talk) 02:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hazel Terry
Ref number  1    -  which  I  did  not  do -  looks  completely  wrong. Are you able  to  fix  up  please? 175.33.45.21 (talk) 02:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Have I fixed what you are referring to? LittlePuppers (talk) 02:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Please place the  file of  Sir  John  Gielgud  UNDER  the one of  Denis  Nielson-Terry. Sorry again and thanks   for your  help 175.33.45.21 (talk) 02:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Done MB 03:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

How to Properly Publish a Bio About Another Person
Hello. I am a writer/editor. Earlier this month, I edited the biography of a friend of many years - Christopher Mason Powell. To this end, I created an account named after him and created for him, with the agreement that I would turn it over to him after I submitted the article on Wikipedia for publishing consideration.

The first article submission was deleted; it was not referenced well. I discovered this I learned that Wikipedia accounts couldn’t be shared. My violation of this policy was innocent and I would like to remedy this if possible without Chris losing the ability to have the Christopher Masan Powell name for him. So my need for help is two-fold. First, I would like to create a new account for myself. Can this be done in a way that we don't risk losing the name? Second, I would like to submit the revised, referenced, article for consideration. Chris already appears in other Wikipedia articles on musician pages and has therefore been validated as a musician, songwriter, and producer, so I gather if there are no policy violations the article is publishable. What is the best way to represent the article? ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher Mason Powell (talk • contribs) 03:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * If Christopher Mason Powell is noteworthy, then somebody who doesn't happen to know him will eventually create an article about him.


 * You say you are not Powell; and therefore your username violates policy here. Let's put that aside for a moment. You created a completely unsourced draft at User:Christopher Mason Powell. That's the wrong place, and your draft was very properly deleted. The right place -- for a user with no personal connection to Powell -- would be Draft:Christopher Mason Powell.


 * Back to the username violation. Please stop using this user ID. Create your own. (You can use your real name if you wish, although most people prefer not to.) You'd then be welcome to edit articles about people who aren't personal friends, and other matters about which you could write disinterestedly. Note that material must be based on published, reliable sources. -- Hoary (talk) 03:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

List of wedding guests of Prince William and Catherine Middleton
In the "British Armed  Forces "  section - I cannot  add the  accent on the  word  "Shan"  on the  Link  for Dame  Shan (Elizabeth ) Leege-Burke. Can you please add the accent? Thanks 175.33.45.21 (talk) 03:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Done.
 * The obvious way to have done it, Sister B, was to go to the article for Shân Legge-Bourke via the name in the above list, which was already a wikilink to it, copy an "â" from that article, and paste it into the list in place of the erroneous "a".
 * The easier way would have been to place the cursor in the section's edit window where the "â" was required, go to the bottom of the window and click the "insert" box's open arrow "∨", select "Latin" from the drop-down list, and click the "â" box which would have inserted an â where the cursor was.
 * This second method, of course, also works for the plethora of other accented letters, symbols, etc., etc. that are available via those drop-down arrays.
 * I actually used the first method, in order to confirm the spelling in the relevant article, since you didn't actually say in your request above above what accent was needed. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.221.81.75 (talk) 03:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Geneviève Ward
Please fix up the  italics  in the opening  lines - I meant  for it  only to be in "black" for the  subject's other  name -  Countess etc.  Sorry  175.33.45.21 (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello, anon. I believe I fixed your problem.  JTP (talk • contribs) 05:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Freemake Video Converter : When was Logo added?
Hi,

According to Wikipedia, Freemake Video Converter, version 4.0.4.0  was the first to have a watermark logo  at the end of videos lasting 5 mins or over.

Well, I tried an earlier version, 4.0.3.4  and this ALSO HAS the Watermark Logo!

My goal is to find the version produced immediately BEFORE the watermark Logo first appeared, ie, one whichaa DOES NOT have the watermark Logo?

As I say, Wikipedia believed version 4.0.4.0 was the first time the Watermark Logo was introduced, but it clearly was not! Does anyone know the true answer to this, please?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.64.87.212 (talk) 06:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * This help desk is for help in using Wikipedia. You might like to repost your question at Reference desk/Computing. -- Hoary (talk) 09:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Help with fair use rationales
Hello, I hope this is the right place to post. I am writing an article for a noteworthy photograph (Draft:A Jewish boy surrenders in Warsaw) and the identity of its subject is unknown. Therefore there are a bunch of fair use images I'd like to add for the various people who might be the boy in the photo, for readers to compare. I know that I can't upload the images until I mainspace the article, but I'm not sure what the correct fair use tagging is. One of the images has been tagged and posted to Tsvi C. Nussbaum (one of the possibilities). Could someone tell me if the fair use tagging I used there is correct for this purpose? Thanks in advance! Catrìona (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I fail to see how attaching images of other boys, so that the readers may guess which one of them (if any) this boy is, is the job of an encyclopedia. Anyway, it seems an impossible task, as the resolution (in the original, pre-digital sense) of this photo is so low. (A good way to judge whether people in photos are the same is to compare their ears. In this photo, one ear is little more than a mere smudge; the other isn't visible at all.)


 * Ideally, we'd say that WP should say that the boy was whoever reliable sources say he was, "reliable sources" being newspapers, etc. The problem is that on slow news days, ostensibly reliable newspapers have a habit of uncritically quoting this or that person who insists that they or their brother/uncle/whatever was the photographed person. This accounts for a lot of the content of, say, V-J Day in Times Square (and a lot of dreary argufying about it).


 * There are plenty of other additions that would be worthwhile. Where's the evidence that this is "The best-known photograph taken during the Warsaw Ghetto uprising"? Aside from its publication [if that's the right word] in Es gibt keinen jüdischen Wohnbezirk in Warschau mehr!, did it have any other Nazi use? How has it been republished and/or discussed after the fall of Nazism? Do we know anything about the photographer? And more. It's unlikely that any of these needs images. -- Hoary (talk) 10:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help. The problem is that despite being considered one of the best known images of World War II and the Holocaust (it was selected as one of Time Magazine's 100 photographs of all time and said to represent all 6 million Jewish Holocaust victims; even to the point of being extensively discussed by Holocaust deniers ), and two books having been written about the photograph, no definite identification of the boy has been made. The photographer is also not known for certain. Obviously the draft needs a lot of work, but the identity of the boy is something that is heavily discussed in the relevant literature. If fair use images are not appropriate to include in that discussion, I will not add them. Catrìona (talk) 10:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I wrote my (perhaps somewhat crabby) comment above before looking at the article Tsvi C. Nussbaum. I there got the impression that there were three entire books about, or somehow based on, the photo. And also that Nussbaum didn't seem to have any notability (in en:WP terms) aside from the article. So even before you wrote your additional comment, I was going to return here to say: (i) yes an article seemed most worthwhile; (ii) such an article would render the article on Nussbaum unsustainable.


 * All I know about Nussbaum is what I read in that WP article. You may very well know more. But if (i) there's little or nothing more to know and (ii) the article you propose is successful, then I predict that the article on Nussbaum will be turned into a mere redirect. As it has an edit history, this seems a pity.


 * How about bringing into your draft everything from the article on Nussbaum that seems useful, expanding the draft until it's primarily about the photograph, replacing the content of the Nussbaum article with your draft, and then renaming ("moving") the article?


 * If these books and (denialist stuff aside) the sources you mention above discuss the identity of the boy, then that would indeed seem to be a good reason to bring in photographs of the contenders. I suppose that Template:Non-free use rationale would cover it. You'd need to answer, among others, "How does the media contribute significantly to the article(s) in which it is used?" This may be a lot easier to answer convincingly once the article is well developed: a photo of a person will seem a lot more appropriate (and less like mere decoration) once the description of that person's identity and claims to being the boy photographed are carefully done. -- Hoary (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hoary's main point is that Tsvi C. Nussbaum is notable only for the photograph, so there should be only one article. I agree, and that's our guideline (WP:1E). The easiest way to do this is probably to massively rework the existing article to insert information from your draft, and then rename ("move") it to your new name. This preserves the article history without a lot of hassle. You might want to discuss your approach, whatever it is, on the talk page of that article. "Fair use" rationales will then become easier after the article in in place. -Arch dude (talk) 15:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry for having been verbose. (I blame sleepiness.) Yes, Arch dude got it right. -- Hoary (talk) 03:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Userboxes
Hi there. This is a sorta-experienced editor. I need help with Userbox placements in userpages. When I have Userbox categories and page sections, the userboxes overlap with the sections instead of lining up under the section header. Can someone explain and find a way to fix this for me? Thank you. Below is what I had:   Oshawott 12  ==== Talk to me!  09:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * In general the simplest way to fix a vertical overlap is to use the clear template. I your case, put it just above the fist section heading.-Arch dude (talk) 15:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Fixed....? Thanks   Oshawott 12  ==== Talk to me!  23:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Help needed ADD A LINK BOX FAILED
My name is John Goodsall and i tried to add some current info to the Wiki page about me. I followed the 'ADD LINK' instructions but this is what displayed James Bracken 1 and Brand X 2. 2 should read unsigned comment added by John Goodsall (talk • contribs) 13:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You should not edit that article directly as you have a conflict of interest (WP:COI). Instead, make suggestions on the article's talk page. In this case we kill two birds with one stone, as another editor can also do all the fiddly stuff while making the edit. Another issue is that any editor who gets rewarded would need to declare this under the WP:PAID policy, and would then also have to avoid direct edit to the article. Therefore, while your offer is surely appreciated, it's probably not a good idea. -Arch dude (talk) 15:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Mobile uploads
Moving question asked at Template talk:Help me Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

How to upload photograph in a Wikipedia page through mobile phone Srikanth Cheetirala1997 (talk) 09:38, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I don't know the answer to your question, but you asked it in an unusual place. I've moved your question here to the help desk so that an editor who might know the answer can help you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * You may find the answer at WP:Teahouse useful. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Wrong interwiki link? (II)
After "early" archiving, are there any other views on this issue?--Neufund (talk) 17:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Editing the "Urmetazoan" page to include photographs
I would like to update and add photos to the Urmetazoan page, but should probably talk to someone first. They are not hypothetical, but the fossils are unlike anything seen to date. Complete Body Fossils (CBF's) are real, but I am the first to discover their existence, and I am having trouble finding an expert with an open mind. These are not a pile of bones, these are complete bodies that have survived the fossilization process. Most of the fossils have been altered beyond a true ID, but several were lucky enough to survive the +/- 500 million years until I found them on family property up in Montana. If it works out that I can update the Urme page, I have other important fossils that will make your site a go-to spot for fossils hunters interested in Cambrian and Pre-Cambrian fossils, and I have a very special turtle fossil in it's shell, that: A. is over 300 million years old, and B. shows how the turtle got it's shell.

17:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)17:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)66.171.15.226 (talk)


 * Your own unpublished original research doesn't belong on Wikipedia. If you have information which is supported by references to published independent reliable sources this will be welcomed, but if you have a conflict of interest you ought not to edit the aricle yourself but instead you should propose changes(with supporting evidence) on the article's talk page. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * [I have wikilinked the relevant article from the query's heading for the benefit of those who might be interested in this topic. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.221.81.75 (talk) 10:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)]

Hurricane Irma
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Irma

on the website they got Hurricane Irma max winds speeds at 180 mph and i got a link where it says it had winds at 185 mph for 37 hours longest on record, plus there alot of links that said that to 37 hours of 185 mph winds

https://weather.com/storms/hurricane/news/hurricane-tropical-storm-irma-recap-2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skullmaster43 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Feel free to bring up the matter at Talk:Hurricane Irma. -- Hoary (talk) 03:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Made an edit 4 months ago which was then removed by a sock puppet. Cannot find contribution in page history.
I think I'm supposed to be able to find my contribution on the page history as I believe I have been automaticaly notified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citruskeptic (talk • contribs) 19:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Your only edit, other than the one you just made, is this one, which occurred about four months ago.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  19:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Maybe you are thinking of [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism_in_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=843318945 this] anonymous edit made right before your account was created. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Add another to One Hit Wonders List for 1960's
Do not want to be a publisher or an editor to Wikipedia. I have contributed cash before but have no interest in editing an article. However, please add the following for the "One Hit Wonders" list:

"Sugar Shack" by Jimmy Gilmer and the Fireballs, number 1 hit of 1963 from the Billboard ratings. This song appeared in several 1960 one hit wonder lists back in it's day. To us old folk, this is a glaring miss. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattle49er (talk • contribs) 21:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * So what's written here about "Daisy Petal Pickin'" is wrong? -- Hoary (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * That comment by me immediately above is wrong-headed: whether the group had any other hits is by the way; what matters is whether they are perceived as having had any other hits. Feel free to bring up "Sugar Shack" at Talk:List of one-hit wonders in the United States. NB you'll need to cite two "reliable sources" saying that it was/is a "one-hit wonder". -- Hoary (talk) 03:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Seattle49er. I have added this to the 1960s entry and provided two sources, including a comment on the article's Talk page. There are some discussions there about the criteria, so I just hope it won't get edited out. Regards, - Darwin Naz (talk) 00:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)