Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2019 April 12

= April 12 =

What is the bar for "own work"?
I came across and was surprised that the author of the piece would be alive to upload it as their own work. On closer look it seems that a title was added at an angle relative to the photo—and I'm not sure what other elements—to make this a cover of a book. I'm too new to Wikipedia to say whether this should stay or go. Does it count as an author's own work? Would it not be better to use the original photograph in this case?

I'm also wondering how I would bring this to someone's attention who knows more than I do about the workings of Wikipedia. Would posing this question on the talk page for the photo be the right course of action? Dilligentlizard (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Good catch, but unfortunately you're asking in the wrong place. This is a Wikimedia Commons matter; Wikimedia Commons isn't Wikipedia; and I imagine that the place to ask about it is Commons:Village_pump/Copyright. (I could make comments on this myself, but I think I'd better not.) -- Hoary (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Although this is indeed a matter for Commons, in-house we have Media copyright questions that can answer that sort of queries.
 * My $0.02: the first question is whether the original photograph (a British newspaper cover from 1905) is copyrighted. If it lapsed into public domain, no additional copyright applies: taking a photograph of the original (at a bad angle, BTW) and slapping some text indication over it passes neither the US threshold of originality, nor the UK's sweat of the brow doctrines. Yet, we should use the original photograph instead. If it did not, the modified image is a copyvio that we should not use. Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Compromised accounts missing information
Hello. I originally asked this on Jimbo's talk page, but was directed here. On the Compromised accounts page, there is a sentence saying "In late 2016 this became a particular concern, with many accounts being compromised by a hacker group." However, I haven't found any information anywhere elaborating on this incident. Where is more info on this, and can this be explained or linked to on that page? Thank you. DrewieStewie (talk) 01:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Per WP:DENY, we wouldn't and shouldn't wish to elaborate more on that page. For your personal consumption, you could read this statement by the Foundation. Lourdes  05:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Lupton family
Please fix  up  gap over  the  last  line  in the  Darnton   Lupton  section  on this  page. Sorry, I  cannot  fix  it  myself  on this  device. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srbernadette (talk • contribs) 04:02, April 12, 2019 (UTC)
 * While I've repaired the error you placed within the article, I'm wondering what stopped you from correcting it yourself? It was just a backspace, eh? Lourdes  05:07, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

API Information
I want to use about city information provided by Wikipedia. Like overview,image,maps, Area section, population information etc. I try to find out Wikipedia API that provide all information related to city in JSON format but I can’t find such type of API. Could you please suggest me that how can I use Wikipedia information in my web site. Is there any specific API that provide all information about any city.? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.42.91.34 (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a database. Wikidata sounds more suited for you. Click "Wikidata item" under "Tools" in the left pane of an article to see the Wikidata information about the article subject, e.g. . Many Wikipedia articles pull some of their data from Wikidata. Wikidata does not pull data from Wikipedia but bots often copy information from Wikipedia to Wikidata. Many things are only at one of the sites and the common things are not always identical. I haven't tried the Wikidata API but see mw:Wikibase/API. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:14, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

nominate for deletion
How do I nominate an article for deletion? Sardaka (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Choice of 3 processes, see WP:Deletion process. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Question about Huggle
I'm new to Huggle. When patrolling recent changes, I would like to see the change as implemented in a Wikipedia article like I do with Twinkle. Is there a way I can do this? I also asked the question at the Teahouse. Link: Teahouse Mstrojny (talk) 10:02, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * This question has already been answered at the Teahouse. Mstrojny (talk) 11:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Translation
Hello,

I have created an article in Wikipedia in greek language.

You may find it here https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9F%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%BF%CE%B3%CE%AD%CE%BD%CE%B5%CE%B9%CE%B1_%CE%A0%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%AD%CF%81%CE%B1

Could you please advice how can I create an English version of this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpml2019 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello, . Translated articles are welcome: please see WP:Translation for information on how to do it. By the way, a clearer way to wikilink to an article in another Wikipedia is this:  displays as  el:Οικογένεια Πατέρα. (If you need such a link from within an article, it's better to use the template ill). --ColinFine (talk) 21:03, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Help with an article that was recently flagged and moved to draft.
This page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joey_Attawia was moved to Draft status and I am unsure why. The person is a coworker and is an active television and film producer. It appears his picture was removed for copywrite violation and then the entire article was placed into draft mode. What can i do to get this article out of Draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulferlita (talk • contribs) 15:17, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems the page was moved to draft by as it appears to have been created in return for payment. The summary left by 'Doc' was "Paid articles need to go through AfC" which is the Wikipedia review process. The creator of the page  would need to include it in the process by adding   to the top of the page. It has also been requested that they read WP:PAID and make any disclosures necessary but it is not clear if this has been complied with. Further, any persons with a connection to the subject have what is known as a conflict of interest and should read that page and only make edit requests via the article talk page. Also, the notability guidelines should be complied with. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 17:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Question about Category:Toxins
Hello. I just posted in the Talk page of Category talk:Toxins, and while doing so, saw this: "Talk pages in this namespace are generally not watched by many users. Please consider visiting the Help desk for a more prompt response or reviewing the Categorization FAQ for quick tips." As such, I'm also bringing the question here. I believe the category page may be incorrectly placed under Category:Toxicants, but we could use a subject matter expert to finalize that assessment. I don't know if there is anything else to be done at this point, but posting here in case there is. Thank you! Kind regards, Lostraven (talk) 15:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The Toxicant article says that Toxicants are any toxic substance and adds "The term covers substances that may be man-made, biologically produced, or naturally occurring" - X201 (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, the source used to substantiate that claim doesn't actually substantiate it. It only says "Whether a chemical is synthetic or "natural" has no bearing on its toxicity." It doesn't explicitly say that a toxicant can be man made and/or naturally occurring. I'll take that up on the Toxicant page. I DID find a source that claims all toxins are toxicants, but, as I pointed out on the Toxicant talk page, this and this source treat them separately. There seems to be disagreement in the literature, and indeed, a subject matter expert could be useful here. Lostraven (talk) 19:12, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Is it okay to leave in a self-link if the link covers something that lacks an article?
The page for dry cleaning has the following sentence:

"The potential for petroleum-based solvents was recognized by French dye-works operator Jean Baptiste Jolly…"

The link for "Jean Baptiste Jolly" links back to "dry cleaning" (no particular section). Should the link be removed?--75.110.35.108 (talk) 18:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I've changed the redirect to point to the relevant section of the target page. The redirect could be changed to an article in its own right if the subject meets the notability requirements. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:52, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks.--75.110.35.108 (talk) 16:37, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Potentially Dangerous Spam from User Thepharma
User Thepharma keeps adding spam here that Firefox IDs as "Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead ... Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to www.canadadrugs247.com. If you visit this site, attackers could try to steal information like your passwords, emails, or credit card details..." Kolyvansky (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The site has invalid certificate but is not dangerous although this is spam, of course. Ruslik_ Zero 20:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Gabriel Chabo
Gabriel Chabo Gaby, född Chabo den 2 januari i Qamichli är en svensk TV-profil, artist och bloggare Vip, LGBT Aktiv/ Supporter , Är känd Som Skönhets Expert, Och kallar sig BOSS

Populärt i Sociala Medier Facebook, Instagram , twitter Instagram.com/gabriellchabo Facebook.com/gabriellchabo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrielchabojr (talk • contribs) 22:41, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * . If you want to write an article in Swedish, please go to the Swedish Wikipedia. I don't know what the relevant policies are on sv-wiki, but on en-wiki, writing about yourself is strongly discouraged, and articles must be mostly based on what people unconnected with the subject have chosen to publish about the subject. The subject's own writings are mostly irrelevant. --ColinFine (talk) 23:02, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Billboard links
Hi, in Tears in Heaven, some of the external links to Billboard don't work [properly]; in particular: Since those references use the Singlechart template, and I don't know how to correspondingly improve the template parameter settings, can anybody here provide further assistance?--Hildeoc (talk) 22:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Tears_in_Heaven leads to https://www.billboard.com/music/Eric-Clapton/chart-history/adult-contemporary, though it should actually lead to https://www.billboard.com/music/Eric-Clapton/chart-history/adult-contemporary/song/9684.
 * Tears_in_Heaven leads to https://www.billboard.com/music/Eric-Clapton/chart-history/hot-mainstream-rock-tracks, though it should lead to https://www.billboard.com/music/Eric-Clapton/chart-history//song/9684, where you get by klicking  at https://www.billboard.com/music/Eric-Clapton/chart-history/hot-mainstream-rock-tracks –  However, the target content currently seems to be broken or rather to have been moved somewhere else!
 * They're not broken - they're supposed to link to the relevant chart (Adult Contemporary, Mainstream Rock Songs, etc) and then you can scroll down that page and see the peak positions for every song on that chart. Linking to a specific song would be a nightmare... there are over 120,000 song articles on Wikipedia, and it would mean going through every single one, and searching for and adding the unique ID number for each song. It's just too time-consuming for anyone to do, when the current template already shows the required information. Richard3120 (talk) 19:35, 13 April 2019 (UTC)