Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2020 May 22

= May 22 =

Joey Fatone
Joseph Anthony Fatone JR was in imagination movers in 2010 as joey, a baseball player, for one episode. hes in a few other tv shows that have been left out of the list too. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heffer2005 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * If you'd like to make a suggestion for an article, please make it in the talk page of that article. For example, if you have a suggestion for Imagination Movers, then make it in Talk:Imagination Movers. Always provide reliable, independent sources for what you say. -- Hoary (talk) 00:11, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note that IMDB and other sites like it that are user-contributed without professional editorial oversight are considered to be reliable sources. Also, there are probably lots of cameo roles in which musicians, and other people who are not primarily actors, appear that are not listed in our filmogs. There seems to be a general trend among editors (I think) towards making filmogs more of a selection of significant works, not an exhaustive list of every appearance. This is particularly necessary because of the lack of reliable sources to cite those less-significant works. —[  Alan M 1  (talk) ]— 00:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Citing different articles/titles from the same journal
It's possible to cite different pages from the same source. How do I do this for different articles or titles from the same journal? Even if it's not necessary and I can just use the page method, leaving the title blank would trigger a 'Missing or empty |title=' error, like this. Is there a way to get around this problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PianistHere (talk • contribs) 03:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi . Cite journal is used to cite a specific paper in a journal, which is why requires both title= (the article) and journal=. I would recommend using a different CS1 template: cite encyclopedia can be used for collections of multiple articles that aren't journals, and for the specific example source above, cite report seems to be the most appropriate. You can then add the section name or page number with the rp or sfn templates like so:   or like so. If you have to cite multiple articles in the same issue of a journal and not multiple sections or pages in an article, I'd just duplicate the reference completely. Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Can i say to people that i wrote the page if i actually did? Also can i tell them my youtube channel so they can subscribe?
this is what i wrote

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Phantom09754YT (talk • contribs) 04:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The goal of Wikipedia is to write encyclopedia articles, not to promote yourself or your YouTube channel. I see that your recent edits have been reverted.  As part of the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, you can start a discussion on the article talk page, such as Talk:Chinese New Year, to discuss your ideas to improve the articles as well as provide reliable sources, to help build consensus on improving the articles.  Happy editing!  GoingBatty (talk) 04:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * As GoingBatty points out, Wikipedia already has an article on Chinese New Year. And it avoids (and will delete) additional articles on any given subject: See Content forking. &para; Additionally, you have to write with a high signal to noise ratio. Sample:
 * "What is Chinese new year? Chinese new year is a celebration where they celebrate, you guessed it, new year. In chinese new year they celebrate with costume dragons and instruments."
 * This says nothing more than
 * "Chinese new year is celebrated with costume dragons and instruments."
 * And no, please do not attempt to promote your Youtube channel. Attempts will be deleted. -- Hoary (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

About awrds
Why star parivaar and dada saheb awards we can not add on celebrites wikipage Because awrds is really important achivments so its really necessiry Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheetal parmar (talk • contribs) 08:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * In this series of edits you added awards to the page about somebody. removed mention of them as "unnotable". I don't claim to know anything about them (though I do know that there are many awards and that most aren't notable). If these are notable, perhaps you could create articles about them. Reliably sourced articles, of course. This would demonstrate notability. -- Hoary (talk) 09:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Remove Prod BLP box from article
i want to remove prod blp box from article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goutamrazpurohit (talk • contribs) 09:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You are free to remove a BLP prod as you see fit; but you should explain your actions in either the edit summary or at the article's talk page. See WP:BLPPROD for more information. Please note that other deletion methods exist and can be uitlised even if the PROD is removed. In certain circumstances a page can be re-proposed as a (non-BLP) PROD. If you want more specific advice please link to the page concerned. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * This appears to be about Draft:Murari lal pareek; I have removed the PROD notice as it is not applicable in draftspace. Please make sure it is properly sourced when re-submitting. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

A very active user with privileges over me, is going to delete again a page about a legal political party which I had recently restored
A very active user, called Ontzak, with privileges over me, is going to delete again a page about a legal political party in Puerto Rico, called "Movimiento de Reunificación de Puerto Rico con España", which I had recently restored. I found today, May 22nd 2020, that this page had been deleted previously by another user called Antur arguing the reason A4, irrelevant article. Then, I just restored the page arguing that the page wasn't irrelevant as my sole action proves, but then again, the user Ontzak, which appearently happens to be an antispanish basque secessionist, has claim criterion G9 to delete again the page of this legal political party because, according to Ontzak, this page doesn't meet the minimal criteria to stay in Wikipedia. I would like to know which are those criteria as I find both actions of deletion to be motivated by ideological reasons. I would like some impartial administrator to read this and, if case, reduce privileges to these users which, in my opinion are abusing of their rights and are distorting the impartiality of Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himno Anonimo (talk • contribs) 09:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Your edit history indicates no edits to any such article(perhaps your edits were to the Spanish Wikipedia, a different project?)- but the mere existence of any organization does not merit that organization a Wikipedia article, it must meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If your edits were to the Spanish Wikipedia, you will have to resolve this dispute there, using whatever processes they have for doing so. 331dot (talk) 10:11, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * user:Ontzak is also mainly active on Spanish Wikipedia,and has very little English Wikipedia history, so that's probably a good guess. Meters (talk) 10:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * enwiki does not have a current deletion criterion A4, and criterion G9 is rarely used, so it does seem likely that this refers to eswiki, not to enwiki. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Kennedy of Knocknalling Genealogy
I have a copy of a genealogy published in 1883 titled Kennedy, Knocknalling Branch, 1142-1083. It was prepared by J Douglas Kennedy, Scarthwaite, Lancaster, 1884 It is about 30 pages long. Is this something suitable for Wikipedia and if it is, how would it be added? Jerry2318 (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are asking if you want to put the text of this publication on Wikipedia, the answer is no- Wikipedia is not for posting sources themselves. 331dot (talk) 12:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * , and if you're asking about using it as a source, Wikipedia doesn't normally concern itself with genealogies. -- Hoary (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * it's possible that you could upload it to Wikisource: I don't know what their criteria are for accepting material. --ColinFine (talk) 12:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * You can add it at Wikisource. As a separate issue, the next question is whether or not it constitutes a "reliable source" that you can cite at Wikipedia. A work of this type if published today would be a "vanity" publication. At the time it was probably published "by subscription". Go on over to the Reliable sources/Noticeboard to ask about this. My guess: you can cite it for facts but it does not help to establish notability. -Arch dude (talk) 14:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The actual process is to scan it and add it to Wikimedia Commons as a djvu file. Commons is used by all Wikisource and Wikipedia projects. After going to that effort, you can in theory then cite the commons file directly from Wikipedia articles, but a small amount of extra effort of adding it to Wikisource will make it much more usable. You would then cite the Wikisource instead of the djvu at Commons. -Arch dude (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Please help
Why when I add or edit something does it disappear even though I’m documenting it??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhkyley5 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Looking at your edits to Winthrop University, you changed the formatting of section titles to all caps, which goes against Wikipedia's Manual of Style and the change was therefore reverted and you added one person to the Alumni section for which no article exists and without providing a reliable source and this was also reverted, as there is no evidence of notability. Mikenorton (talk) 15:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I have just reverted your addition of another person to the alumni for the same reasons. Mikenorton (talk) 15:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * There are multiple links to 'get you started' in the welcome message at your talk page; please study those carefully. Please note, lists of alumni etc. should only contain persons who are the subject of Wikipedia articles; I.e. are notable in the Wikipedia sense and should typically be supported by independent, reliable sources. Biographical articles such as the one you created for Paul Vicknair will not be accepted into the encyclopedia without sourcing. Eagleash (talk) 15:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Link to an image; but don't display it
What's the wikitext markup or template to place a link to an image page without displaying the image? Like, if you wanted to link to a fair-use image with a particularly good rationale on a talk page to demonstrate how to craft a fair-use rationale? Every way of linking it I can come up with then displays the image, which is a violation of fair use on a talk page. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Prefix the name of the image with a leading colon, like File:Example.jpg (renders as File:Example.jpg) * Pppery * it has begun... 15:11, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Talk page of Tara Reade
There was an AfD for Tara Reade which decided to merge it into Joe Biden sexual assault allegation. Talk:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation now has a notice which says: "The contents of the Tara Reade page were merged into Joe Biden sexual assault allegation on 17 May 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page." However, Talk:Tara Reade redirects to this page, so it is unclear if any content from the talk page was lost. I'm not sure what should be done about this, but I think at least there should be a link to the Afd on a relevant talk page.— Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 20:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Naddruf the Tara Reade article has been moved along with its talk to Draft:Tara Reade. Hopefully everything will be tidied up when the  deletion review is concluded. TSventon (talk) 22:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, but there is no link on either of those pages to the AfD for Tara Reade, or the deletion review (not to be confused with the AfDs for Joe Biden sexual assault allegation).— Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 23:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Generally the best person to ask about an AfD close is the AfD closer, in this case Black Kite. If you ask them at Talk:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation you can include the links you are asking about. I would expect the merger notice to be corrected once the deletion review is concluded (and if it weren't corrected you could ask the deletion review closer). TSventon (talk) 05:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

List of Banks
Back in 1996 First Interstate Bank was merged with Wells Fargo Bank during the hostile take over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:E800:6000:4084:13FA:E7E2:C7B4 (talk) 22:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, that what it says at First_Interstate_Bancorp. If you see another article with an error, you can start a discussion on that article's talk page.  RudolfRed (talk) 22:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Where to report a user with multiple accounts?
Hello. Could someone please let me know what the best place is to report a user who has multiple accounts? The user is not attempting to hide this fact, so I don't know whether WP:SPI is the right place or not. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , SPI is the correct location... If there is a particular reason why it's no good, try WP:ANI, but that's not really the first place to go to. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your help. I'll post it at SPI as a starting point. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 00:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You say they aren't hiding it so note Sock puppetry. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I misread - I thought it said misusing multiple accounts. There are some uses that are completely within policy. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks Lee and PrimeHunter for the follow-up info. Yes, I'd checked the list of legitimate uses and none of them apply in this case. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Fix reference
Can you fix the reference i Made Please. 68.102.42.216 (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This has already been fixed by RudolfRed (talk) 23:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Find edits in history page by edit summary
Is there a tool that allows you to find edits in a history page by edit summary?-- SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 23:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The best thing I can think of is to click the "View history" and then use your browser's find feature (e.g. CTRL-F in Google Chrome) to search the edit summaries. If that doesn't find the edit, you can click "500" to show the last 500 edits instead of the default 50 and try finding again.  If that doesn't work, you can click "older 500" or change the number in the URL from "limit=500" to "limit=1000", and keep going from there.  Happy hunting!  GoingBatty (talk) 01:13, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks!. I had this idea but I thought if there was a tool it would have been easier.-- SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 01:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * There is WP:BLAME, but I don't think it helps here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:16, 24 May 2020 (UTC)