Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2022 February 3

= February 3 =

Help with web citation for Wayback Machine
Hi,

I was trying to update a citation for this article, and had a problem, which I described here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_countries_by_food_self-sufficiency_rate#Web_archive_of_source_material

I hope an editor can review the issue and fix it. Regards, KaldeFakta68 (talk) 00:43, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

✅ Hi, was this what you were asking for help with? Cmr08 (talk) 05:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

-Great, thanks ! KaldeFakta68 (talk) 11:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Text size selection on mobile view
I am unable to see settings which was earlier available for mobile view of Wikimedia pages.

This is must, please retain this button so that I can start using Wikimedia on mobile again

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:169A:D106:B831:2604:AAB:AD2A (talk) 02:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi there! Are you referring to the mobile view of the English Wikipedia in a browser (i.e. http://en.m.wikipedia.org ), or are you using a Wikipedia app?  GoingBatty (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, IP user. I'm not sure what you're referring to (I still see the text selection option on my Android mobile app) but in any case, this is a page for help with the process of editing Wikipedia. Nobody here (probably) knows anything about the implementation of the user interface: please ask at WP:VPT. --ColinFine (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Rana_Ayyub
Rana Ayyub wrote this in March 2015.

Nun rape and church vandalism: The fringe is now mainstream

The article ends, stating that Bangladeshis were not responsible. After the arrests of the accused, who were convicted, there is an editor's note that the article was written before the arrest. The editor's note was added after the conviction, initially, it was not there.

Contrary to what she wrote, actually, a Bangladeshi was convicted not locals.

She promoted her article twice through her Twitter account and did not delete or gave any updates.

https://twitter.com/ranaayyub/status/577862190906011648

https://twitter.com/ranaayyub/status/577805661460795392

Can this be inserted in the controversy section, as she gave wrong information and didn't clarify afterward, in spite of the editor adding a note at the end of the article? Knight Skywalker (talk) 03:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * This is something you should bring up at Talk:Rana Ayyub for more focused input. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * This is more about policy- whether editor leaving a note, after conviction of actual accused, can be mentioned in article, or will it be original research. As there are no third party coverage on this, other than editor's note. Knight Skywalker (talk) 06:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Request for removing the deletion nominations of the articles deleted long back by the user who gave those nominations from my user talk page as they are filling space
I am a user of Wikipedia. May I draw your attention towards my request for removing the deletion nominations of the articles deleted long back by the user who gave those nominations from my user talk page as they are filling space. This is to tell you that I had joined Wikipedia five years ago in the month of April and it's from then I saw that the articles written by me had got speedy deletion nominations as they required original research, references and additional citations and just because I did not understand and unknowingly used to remove the maintenance templates I was given warnings as to not remove them without resolving that particular issue. I then realized my mistake and then did not do any such thing and I did not write any such article again without references, citations and on biographies of living persons after the articles which were nominated for deletion were finally challenged and removed from Wikipedia without knowledge. I did obey all the warnings given to me for my safety. So now as I have learnt my lesson and how Wikipedia actually works I request you to remove all those deletion nominations of the articles which were deleted long back after they were nominated for deletion from my user talk page. I hope you would do the needful and oblige. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MukKausheeki (talk • contribs) 07:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You do not currently have any deletion notifications on your talk page. However, it is your talk page, so you are free to remove them yourself. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:00, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I removed them after reading this. He must have got talk page edit notification. Knight Skywalker (talk) 08:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * For more information on what you may and may not do on your user talk page, see WP:OWNTALK. Happy editing!  GoingBatty (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Video Game Development Pages
Hello, I was wondering if there was any way to find all Wikipedia pages related to the in-depth development of a video game. For example, TLOU2 and Uncharted 4. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IvanN7 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * see Category:Development of specific video games. Neocorelight (Talk) 12:44, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

- Thank you for the fast reply, it's exactly what I was looking for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IvanN7 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm glad I could help. Neocorelight (Talk) 12:56, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Rules about using [donated] artwork for a biography if a photo doesn't exist
Hi there, I don't know the rules in the English Wikipedia, that's why I'm asking: Is there are rule about the possibility of using an artwork, like a commissioned painting or drawing, for a biographical article, if there's no photo available? In the German Wikipedia, it's forbidden because of original research. WhaT's the state here? Thanks, --Jcornelius (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi there! For living people, it's not permitted because it's theoretically possible for someone to take a photograph and upload it.  For deceased people, artwork is OK, like George Washington.  GoingBatty (talk) 16:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually,, there is precedent for what you propose. Until his diplomatic efforts in 2018, there was no freely licensed photo of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. For quite a while, the artistic work File:Kim Jong-Un Photorealistic-Sketch.jpg was the lead image in the article. Cullen328 (talk) 19:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot to both of you, and ! The German-speaking Wikipedia community is indeed much stricter on that, as drawings are either considered copyright infringement (when 'copied'/drawn after something already existing) or original research (as based on the fantasy of the artist). Cheers, --Jcornelius (talk) 01:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * and  here are some additional thoughts about this interesting issue. The main reason why it is OK to use public domain paintings in George Washington is not because he is dead, but because photography was not yet invented when he was alive. Consider the 5th and 6th presidents of the United States, James Monroe and John Quincy Adams. Monroe died in 1831 and practical photography was invented in 1839 in the form of the daguerreotype, so his biography relies on paintings of him. Adams lived until 1848, so we can use the outstanding photo of him taken by Mathew Brady in the years before his death, and his biography also includes two other photos from his final years. Paintings and an etching are used to illustrate his younger years. As for the policy of the German Wikipedia, I do not know anything about that except what has been stated here. I will say, though, that a skilled portrait painter can study many photos and videos of a person, and then paint an original detailed accurate portrait that is not in any way a copyright violation or a "fantasy". Cullen328 (talk) 03:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Removing "Draft:" in my page title.
Hello,

I have created a page for the American Doodle Registry, and in the header is has Draft: then the page title. I can't seem to get that removed. How can I get it out of the title? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrightk2474 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You don't. Wikipedia is not the place for advertising or promoting your business. RudolfRed (talk) 19:56, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * They vandalized Labradoodle and Goldendoodle, converting them into spamlinks to their advertisement. I've blocked them as clearly not here to build the encyclopedia. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  20:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)