Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2024 February 5

__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ = February 5 =

Ciro's (London)
Ciro's (London) can't purge cache at en.m.w....... 3MRB1 (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Purged. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Are people's image copyrightable
For eg can I use Archie Hamilton picture in his wiki page. Theoverseer1 (talk) 03:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * All images (well, read most) are copyrighted. You can't just use any image you find. We require one of two things. Either the image is free (for the purposes of Wikipedia, it's been released as free under CC-BY-SA), or that we can prove fair use. Usually for alive people, fair use isn't really doable.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 04:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * If you take a picture of Archie Hamilton with your own camera, then the copyright belongs to you and you can upload it and release it under a CC-BY-SA license. If the picture was taken by someone else, then the copyright belongs to them, not you, and you cannot magically declare that it is now licensed under a CC-BY-SA license. They can, but you cannot. -Arch dude (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Dealing with a content dispute
Hi, I came across Land of the Lost (film) while patrolling recent changes. An IP removed the majority of the lead stating that "Critical response does not belong to the lead-in section". Though they've retained the critical response portion after I pointed out that there's no policy supporting removal, they still removed most of the first paragraph of the lead to say that it's "aimed at adult lowbrow viewers" (a bold claim to make, and not supported by the source they used) which I also believe doesn't properly summarize the article. I've already reverted three times, and this is my first content dispute, so I was wondering how I should go forward from now. Thanks, ayakanaa  ( t · c ) 05:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * If it's an IP and they're not regularly editing from the same address, I'd go to WP:RFPP. If it is regularly the same address, WP:3RN might be the best venue. FWIW I saw an unexplained deletion from that article as well and did warn the IP who'd made that edit at their Talk page. If you aren't leaving messages at their Talk page, you need to do so. DonIago (talk) 05:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I've submitted a protection request for the page in light of the IP's continued reverts. DonIago (talk) 06:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

EXPANSION of articles
I would like to start expanding some articles (new text), but I don't have a very good knowledge of English to write almost perfectly, what do you advise me to do? I take this opportunity to point out that there is an error in the "further reading" paragraph of the salumeria page, could someone correct it? (I didn't create it). JackkBrown (talk) 09:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * JackkBrown, there are errors in a large percentage of the paragraphs of a large percentage of en:Wikipedia's articles. What you might do is look for an article that seems to be well written but that is under-referenced, attempt to find sources for what it says, and, if you find sources, then add references to those sources. -- Hoary (talk) 12:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I added my first reference in this encyclopedia (on the buccellato di Lucca page), did I make any mistakes? JackkBrown (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @JackkBrown: Per WP:CITESTYLE, I think you should use cite web for the reference you added. GoingBatty (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * , somewhere in this set of edits, you added . Yes, as GoingBatty suggested, it would be a good idea to use cite web. But a couple of more elementary problems: You've provided no link (instead merely a URL that would have to be copied and pasted), and you haven't provided the author's surname (which is no mystery but easy to find). -- Hoary (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

ITN/R topics directly posted
Can we post topics listed in ITN/R without consensus (if the community is neither supporting nor opposing)? Harvici ( talk ) 10:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * This is best asked at the ITN talk page (WT:ITN). Lack of discussion should probably not be taken as a consensus in favor, though. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Lord Taylor of Warwick information
To whom this may concern, I work for Lord Taylor of Warwick and he has requested that information of his age, birthplace and family (children and parents) are removed from the internet. Most common form of finding information is from Wikipedia. I believe in the past his wife, Lady Taylor has removed this unwanted information in the past but it resurfaced. I have tried removing the information myself today but it has reappeared straight away. Any help you can give with this issue would be much appreciated. Avamurrayworking (talk) 10:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * First, you will need to declare as a paid editor, see WP:PAID. This is a Terms of Use requirement.
 * I think it's going to be difficult to keep that information out of the article as it forms part of the reason for his notability(one of the youngest members of the House of Lords), but you should make a formal edit request(click for instructions) on Talk:John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Warwick. 331dot (talk) 10:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your advice, I am not getting any financial gain from this request. I am not wanting to remove the information about him being the youngest member of the House of Lords, we are just hoping to remove his birth date and current age. That should not affect his. notability. Further, his Birth place is an unnessecary peace of information. Finally, his family are not in the public eye and therefore their privacy deserves to be respected. I hope this information can be removed. Avamurrayworking (talk) 11:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * "I work for Lord Taylor of Warwick" - so you most certainly are getting financial gain to make this request. This is not "his page", this is an entry in a global encyclopedia about a public figure. Would you have expected Debrett's to remove such information? We are, frankly, the modern-day equivalent of Debrett's. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  14:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Going by our policy at WP:BLPPRIVACY, I am going to remove the full date of birth and list the year only. The age is automatically calculated and it is in the public interest to have his year of birth and age.
 * As for family - going by our policy at WP:BLPNAME I see no reason to remove the fact that he has children nor that he has an ex-wife. His current wife is discussed in depth on Taylor's personal webpage so I see no reason to remove the name.  Qcne  (talk)  11:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Avamurrayworking: A tax-payer funded politician "Not in the public eye"? Really? Bazza (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Avamurrayworking I have left a message on your Talk Page to declare your conflict of interest and Paid editing. Failure to make this declaration is a breach of our Terms and Conditions.
 * Wikipedia is not censored, and therefore I see no reason why his age, birthplace and family are removed from this article. The pieces of information are correctly sourced.  Qcne  (talk)  11:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I just made this edit . Any reason to consider www.dodspeople.com a WP:BLP-good source? This is their about-page:. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Correct the spelling of a name
Hi,

I work for Philadelphia Ballet. I am trying to edit the name of our artistic director, Angel Corella. Currently his page lists his name as Ángel Corella, but his name does not have an accent in it. How do I change this?

Ángel Corella needs to change to Angel Corella Pbballet (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello. First, as you will have noticed from your user talk page, you must change your user name, as names which imply shared use, or use on behalf of an organisation, are not allowed. You must either change your user name, or abandon the account and create a new, personal account. (You do not have to use your real name - I do, but many users do not) - and it may have your affiliation eg "John at PB", but it must be personal to you.
 * Second, you must read the restrictions on paid editing and make the mandatory public declaration of that status.
 * Third, you should not directly edit articles about Philadelphia Ballet or people associated with it, but should make edit requests relating to them.
 * I see that the very first reference cited in Philadelphia Ballet (which is in Spanish) does use the form "Ángel" for his name, but I see that those in English that I have looked at do not, so I have raised a move request to get the article's title changed. ColinFine (talk) 15:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I see that the article has now been moved. I also see that somebody has tagged it as needing more sources - there are large sections of it which are completely unreferenced. ColinFine (talk) 17:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

stub template locations
how can one conform to STUBSPACING when even if manually placed 3 lines after categories, the template still appears before them? eg. 83.168.137.1 (talk) 16:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The categories always show up at the bottom of the page, below any page contents. STUBSPACING is about how you space them in the page's source code. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 16:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * understood, thank you 83.168.137.1 (talk) 14:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Dark mode
Hi, how can I set the dark mode on my mobile device from the Wikipedia site? The Jack (talk) 16:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes, simply press the user icon on the right to bring up a menu, and then select Dark Mode. By the way, I'm sending you this message from a mobile device. I tried dark mode, but I much prefer light mode. 20 upper (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @JackkBrown: There are several options listed at WP:DARK. GoingBatty (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Legal changes
I have been tidying up the entry for an individual, and removing some of the incorrect (and some libellous) comments there, yet I am being barred from doing so by someone who says the changes are not constructive!. Please advise Trovatore1 (talk) 17:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * You removed two passages of text cited to Reliable sources (the BBC, no less), and from my cursory look, both passages summarised their source accurately. If those Reliable sources are incorrect, you need either to convince their publisher to retract them, or to find equally reliable published sources that contradict them, in which case Wikipedia can present both and allow the readers to compare them.
 * "Tidying up" sounds constructive, but your edits could also be construed as "whitewashing", which is not. You should follow Wikipedia's standard procedure of WP:Bold, revert, discuss, discuss the matter with the reverter (on the article's Talk page, yours, or theirs), and come to a mutually acceptable consensus.
 * May we ask what, if anything, is your connection to the subject David Burgess-Joyce? We have mandatory requirements about disclosure of paid editing, and rules about non-paid but subject-connected persons editing an article directly rather than making Edit requests. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.199.208.215 (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Indeed; I reverted the edit because it removed well-sourced info without justification and added unsourced content. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That article has suffered for months from many editors trying to hide negative BLP details (see my recent few edits/edit-summaries for some thoughts). Feel free to request semiprotection at WP:RFPP; I'm out of time to wiki for now... DMacks (talk) 19:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Help from better editors with picture placement.
I need some help formatting and placing pictures on a page. I am new and tried for ages but could not. Are any experienced editors willing to help?

Note I am unsure if I am doing this right or asking in the right place. So forgive me if I am doing it wrong. Wiki 1756 (talk) 17:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Let me start by saying that nobody is superior than anyone on Wikipedia. I don't use the Visual Editor that much, so this just applies to the Source Editor. Take a copy of the picture name (!Note: Every image begins with File: or Image:), then place two square brackets  on either side of the image name. Put a vertical line | near the image name's end but before the second pair (closing pair) of square brackets, then write "thumb". Then, position that line again and write a caption. The statue of Liberty.jpg in New York, US]] is how your image should appear. 20 upper (talk) 18:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for being so helpful. I actually managed to improve it a little thanks to your advice. I only joined recently, and I am still learning. People like you make it easier. Thanks again! Wiki 1756 (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Your addition of an example is very helpful. Thanks again! Wiki 1756 (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Diet water
In the late 80s and early 90s diet water was an advertisement to stay fit but was taken down after the FDA took it down because it had chemicals like nickel and radon in it and was causing cancer. if you want me to write a full page about diet water shoot me an email. Dietwater7 (talk) 21:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, Dietwater7. If you want to write an article about diet water and you can find the reliable, independent sources required to establish that it meets Wikipedia's criteria for notability, then you are welcome to do so. Bear in mind that such an article must be based on independent published sources: neither your personal knowledge, nor material written or published by people involved with the product, is relevant to writing an article.
 * Note also that if you have a connection with the product (as suggested by your username) - then you have a conflict of interest, and would be well-advised to declare that publicly and familiarize yourself with the pitfalls of writing with a COI.
 * Finally, note that writing a Wikipedia article is extremely challenging for an inexperienced Wikipedia editor, and people who try it before they have spent significant time learning how Wikipedia works commonly have a frustrating and disappointing time.
 * My advice, as usual to new editors, is to put aside that idea entirely for several months, and spend your time improving some of our six million existing articles and learning about Wikipedia, espeically about verifiability, reliable sources, neutral point of view and notability. Then read your first article and, if you want to pick your idea up again, start by looking for the sources. ColinFine (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I notice that your only previous edit has been reverted, as you added a name without a reference to support it, and replace one word with a synonym which (in my opinion) read less well. There is nothing shameful about having your edit reverted, that's how Wikipedia works. But it does suggest that you are not yet equipped to try writing an article. ColinFine (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Article differences between revisions no longer show the actual article.
So I've noticed that differences between revisions of articles, the actual article with the changes no longer shows.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_IMAX_venues&curid=2407040&diff=1203895338&oldid=1203876227&title=List_of_IMAX_venues&diffonly=1

Now I see the DIFFONLY parameter at the end, which is likely the culprit. So I tried a completely different page to rule out that it is a fluke.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keanu_Reeves&curid=16603&diff=1203896175&oldid=1201400318&title=Keanu_Reeves&diffonly=1

It appears not to be a fluke.

Deleting the diffonly=1 and reloading the page has no effect, it just reinserts itself.

How can I revert the Diffonly change?

Thanks! Urbanracer34 (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 22:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks Trappist. Nice to know it's not just me. Urbanracer34 (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This appears to be fixed! Urbanracer34 (talk) 23:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks Trappist. Nice to know it's not just me. Urbanracer34 (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This appears to be fixed! Urbanracer34 (talk) 23:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

José Delbo dead
The Facebook page of comics artist José Delbo contains numerous posts from his colleagues that he has died today. But his Wikipedia page shows him as alive and a Google search for "José Delbo dead" did not produce any results about his death. If Facebook cannot be used as a reliable source, do we have to wait for some sort of official press release until we can update the article about him to show that he is dead? J I P &#124; Talk 22:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * , that is correct. Recent deaths must be verified by a reliable source. There is no rush. Cullen328 (talk) 23:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm starting to see it on a bunch of websites related to comic-books. For example,, which cites a tweet from his family. DMacks (talk) 03:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)